X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <echristley@nc.rr.com>
Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c4)
  with ESMTPS id 4036672 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:32:44 -0500
Received-SPF: softfail
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.240.18.37; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,442,1257148800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="292402763"
Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124])
  by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 23 Dec 2009 08:32:07 -0800
Received: from [10.30.16.81] ([10.30.16.81])
	by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id nBNGW6oP007309
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:32:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B324605.2000006@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:32:05 -0500
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Air Flow Question
References: <list-4036639@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-4036639@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Al Gietzen wrote:
>
>  does the fact that the inlet is behind prop give a much higher 
> effective inlet velocity? 
>

The typical prop that we use adds around 15mph to the air's velocity.