X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.241.44] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c3) with ESMTP id 3997851 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:14:21 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.44; envelope-from=alventures@cox.net Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75]) by fed1rmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20091201191345.GCVM12000.fed1rmmtao102.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:13:45 -0500 Received: from BigAl ([72.192.141.69]) by fed1rmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id BvDl1d00G1W2PoQ04vDl1T; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:13:45 -0500 X-VR-Score: 0.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=74YxcA_jYD8A:10 a=PdT-WOB9pFnEhae7zFkA:9 a=27yzencBz6Izk_SHd6YJP2GoiYEA:4 a=T-7Ihw2hbjRkVARWGyoA:9 a=11fCxlAaqNEp4y0a4coA:7 a=pXjATuHxUhKcNiSCmDnstqcvW4AA:4 X-CM-Score: 0.00 From: "Al Gietzen" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Next generation re-drive Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:14:19 -0800 Message-ID: <6E76CD85398448F0BD13F5C279DE2AD6@BigAl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0002_01CA7277.6D303130" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6856 Importance: Normal Thread-Index: Acpyt2fTbhEhlvbqRuaufg4yzHDRdAAAsZgg In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01CA7277.6D303130 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Next generation re-drive I'm curious why someone like Tracy wouldn't be all over this, if for no other reason than self preservation in the PSRU market. If a working PSRU came to market based on this technology and it was remotely price competitive, it would virtually eliminate all other PSRU's on the market. No gears, no oil, no belts, probably lighter than anything out there, smaller than anything out there and if you get a prop strike the magnetic gears spin free so you wind up replacing just the prop instead of the prop, the PSRU and some expensive engine parts. What am I missing? What's the reason not to jump on this opportunity? Just curious. Plus has built in torque peak damping. I didn't check size, pricing, availability, etc Al ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01CA7277.6D303130 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Next generation re-drive

I'm curious why someone = like Tracy wouldn't be all over this, if for no other reason than self preservation in the PSRU market.  If a working PSRU came to market based on this technology = and it was remotely price competitive, it would virtually eliminate all other = PSRU's on the market.  No gears, no oil, no belts, probably lighter than = anything out there, smaller than anything out there and if you get a prop strike = the magnetic gears spin free so you wind up replacing just the prop instead = of the prop, the PSRU and some expensive engine parts.  

What am I missing? =  What's the reason not to jump on this opportunity?  

Just = curious.

 

Plus has built in torque peak = damping.

 

I didn’t check size, = pricing, availability, etc

 

Al

 

 

 

 

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_0002_01CA7277.6D303130--