X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-qy0-f184.google.com ([209.85.221.184] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3875572 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:53:32 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.221.184; envelope-from=david.staten@gmail.com Received: by qyk14 with SMTP id 14so2899880qyk.26 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:52:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Tt/kh02L+9k8xj9wESconW00dTlKiasUoJwc6J0nLBg=; b=sSe+idJukqWDaDyU+LbX3roT1Ia49BGyXNUy/cN6tJtJJPBfZEksJxoOlZsSNRO0CN OLjofH/AHADuohKss3ac7rye4cimbNIGX2MUKh2BVLr+OZxXIch7+3aZsIBeEeYLYYg4 DhlbRWjoW9UwjporQMY/c8PZEp/3G59Sf00fs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=E4e9OPrkeR5Vl/qhnO+l+bpzZ/O0vY2w4Zft/NTzlYEHaM9EfewwtSt5FjnaPHhfEi etLfhW3l0R08P0eNmofeC63KUJuFtZOcNV//Y7nSh/afOJ1WmhjzB69nHJxUHLi+EsPx 4qSudOQcLCjGhbAn0ICevjzJFL5aIGgTa1p7E= Received: by 10.224.38.40 with SMTP id z40mr713500qad.0.1254779578572; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:52:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?192.168.1.103? ([216.80.140.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm163346qyk.7.2009.10.05.14.52.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4ACA6ABA.4010301@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:52:58 -0500 From: Dave User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Seepage, no more. Oil system References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Barber wrote: > > I do know the system was plumbed in series, however, my ignorance > prevents me from knowing why re-plumbing them in parallel would change > things. Does plumbing in parallel prevent the front cooler from being > a restriction point since oil can flow past the front cooler while > still filling it with hot oil for cabin heating??? Hmm, not sure how I > would plumb this. > Without a temperature bypass or manual shutoff valve placed on the front cooler oil tubing, you may be re-visiting the current problem - cold thick oil getting hammered down 22 feet round trip of 1/2" aluminum tubing through a nose radiator. Pressure follows the path of least resistance, so if the main mazda cooler's vernitherm is open, bypassing that cooler, it may be a non-issue. I have no guarantee that vernitherming the nose cooler (at the firewall, at the fittings) will not cause the current problem, but I feel comfortable estimating that it is much less likely. I'm not even sure theres a way to get a vernitherm off a mazda cooler without messing it up. Dave