X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from poplet2.per.eftel.com ([203.24.100.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3873814 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 08:18:49 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=203.24.100.45; envelope-from=lendich@aanet.com.au Received: from sv1-1.aanet.com.au (sv1-1.per.aanet.com.au [203.24.100.68]) by poplet2.per.eftel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96081737FB for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:18:11 +0800 (WST) Received: from ownerf1fc517b8 (203.171.92.134.static.rev.aanet.com.au [203.171.92.134]) by sv1-1.aanet.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C234BEC011 for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:18:10 +0800 (WST) Message-ID: <204FF92B78694654A8C6D3BAB06688F3@ownerf1fc517b8> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: 801 Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 22:18:13 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01CA4540.905DF2A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 091003-0, 10/03/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CA4540.905DF2A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ben,=20 Didn't see it and although on this list we may not all agree we = seem to be much more tolerant of others ideas. Mind you the proof is = always in the pudding. On PL don't sweat it, it's aggravation you don't = need. I have had exposure to some good ideas from the other list, but = equally I've had a lot of help from this list. Tell me Ben why, didn't you go for the Ford C6 planetary = reduction box, you could machine any parts you need for yourself.=20 George (down under) = /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////= //////////////////////////////////////////////////// George, The main reason I didn't go with the planetary reduction = is that design does not offset crank/ prop centerline. On a V8 that = needs to be done to get the motor to fit into a cowling. That is why my = next creation will probably be a rotary,, they are practically = bulletproof, light,readily available and hanging around here the = positive tips will help in a successful install. Thanks again guys, Ben. Ben, Will look forward to seeing your efforts in this regard. George=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CA4540.905DF2A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 

Ben,=20
Didn't see it and although on = this list we=20 may not all agree we seem to be much more tolerant of others = ideas. Mind=20 you the proof is always in the pudding. On PL don't sweat it, = it's=20 aggravation you don't need.
 
I have had exposure to some = good ideas from=20 the other list, but equally I've had a lot of help from this=20 list.
 
Tell me Ben why, didn't you go = for the Ford=20 C6 planetary reduction box, you could machine any parts you need = for=20 yourself. 
George (down = under)
 
=
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////= /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
George, The main reason I didn't go with the planetary = reduction is=20 that design does not offset crank/ prop centerline. On a V8 that = needs=20 to be done to get the motor to fit into a cowling. That is why = my next=20 creation will probably be a rotary,, they are practically = bulletproof,=20 light,readily available and hanging around here the positive = tips will=20 help in a successful install.
 
Thanks again guys,
 
Ben.
 
Ben,
Will look forward to seeing your efforts in this = regard.
=
George
------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CA4540.905DF2A0--