X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTPS id 3831683 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:33:10 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.240.18.37; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,312,1249282800"; d="scan'208";a="235604922" Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2009 06:31:51 -0700 Received: from [10.62.16.109] (ernestc-laptop.hq.netapp.com [10.62.16.109]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id n81DVpUU010319 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 06:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A9D2244.1030209@nc.rr.com> Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:31:48 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: More Charging Circuit Info References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike Wills wrote: > Al, > That wasnt from me, that was from the weblink Kelly sent. I simply=20 > quoted it. I dont know if it is true or false, but I do know that at=20 > least one of my previous cars opened the alternator field any time the = > starter was engaged. It is my understanding that this is typical of=20 > car ignition switches though I dont know if its necessary or just a=20 > holdover. > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Al Gietzen > *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft > *Sent:* Monday, August 31, 2009 12:18 PM > *Subject:* [FlyRotary] Re: FW: More Charging Circuit Info > > From Mike - =85..ensure that the field is de-energized while > cranking the engine. > > And I will respectfully disagree with that =96 at least until > somebody can prove me wrong. The output current is a function of > rpm as well as what the voltage regulator is demanding. From what > I can find, I conclude that alternators typically won=92t put out > their rated current until they get spinning about 1500 =96 2000 rpm= , > or more (which is usually about double engine rpm). So there is no > risk of damaging the rectifier diodes at cranking speed. > > Consider this: Turning the alt off during cranking isn't a feature to=20 protect on-board electronics. Maybe it is there to protect the alternator= =2E Al is correct. The alternator output is limited by idle speed and=20 generally can't output enough energy to do any damage at cranking speeds.= But say for instance the regulator is demanding 10A at 13.4V. The output = is determined by the combination of how fast the rotor is spinning, and=20 the strength of the rotor's magnetic field. The rotation speed is=20 directly coupled to the engine speed, which doesn't amount to much=20 during cranking. The field strength is tied to how much current the=20 regulator is pumping through the rotor windings. To get that 10A/13.4V,=20 the regulator is going to have to open the rotor current completely. The regulator will be pumping multiple amps through the rotor windings=20 and getting no appreciable output for it's efforts. The current is=20 wasted, doing nothing but heating the regulator circuitry and rotor=20 windings while reducing power to run the starter. Why would you leave the alt on the line, when it is so easy to disable=20 it? Pulling all the other electrical stuff off the line during starting=20 isn't necessarily done to protect one device vs another. From an=20 engineering perspective, it just makes for a simpler system. There are=20 unknown states that simply get removed from the equation. If you're=20 having to turn out a new car model every year, and don't want to=20 implement a testing regimen for each car, pulling everything off line is = just the sane thing to do. For a pampered, one-off project like an=20 airplane, the necessary testing regimen is already in place. If=20 everything works when turned on before start, go fly it. If not, put in=20 some more switches...then go fly it.