X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from poplet2.per.eftel.com ([203.24.100.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.15) with ESMTP id 3767847 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:52:14 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=203.24.100.45; envelope-from=lendich@aanet.com.au Received: from sv1-1.aanet.com.au (sv1-1.per.aanet.com.au [203.24.100.68]) by poplet2.per.eftel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9B31738C7 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:51:36 +0800 (WST) Received: from ownerf1fc517b8 (203.171.92.134.static.rev.aanet.com.au [203.171.92.134]) by sv1-1.aanet.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 697BBBEC01D for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:51:35 +0800 (WST) Message-ID: <5B2FF839867C4B359457051C95C80F07@ownerf1fc517b8> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Intake Runner Tubes Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:51:39 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090721-0, 07/21/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Ben, I figured as much, about the cost, that's why I put up the corn starch recipe. If you were doing something that was very expensive or a commercial application the Aquacore would be good for that application. The inlet tube is cooled by the fuel, however it's the heat soak that could kill the resin, That's why I suggested Al manifold, as it will take most of the heat and dissipate some before it gets to the fiberglass inlet tube. I would be tempted to use a good epoxy resin and see how that goes before going to the expense of high temp resin. Just some suggestions. George (down under) > George, > > I spoke with a guy from the company, Aquacore is available in only in 5 > gallon and 55 gallon containers. The 5 gallon is $125 US. They recommend > using Aquaseal after the part is completed to seal any surface > imperfections and porous surface of the material after machining. A quart > of aqua seal is $40. Then was told to apply peel ply, or some sort of > removal agent. > So not a cheap system. Think I will have a go at the corn starch method > and see what develops. He did say that they would make custom molds from > CAD drawings and ship them ready to lay up with glass, but I am sure that > is not a cheap method either. > > I will likely try this whole crazy idea with corn starch and fiberglass > to see if it will work, then decide from there how to proceed. > > Any one have any ideas what temp the intake would be exposed to under the > cowl? Someone in a previous post mentioned high temp resin, and it got me > thinking I really don't know what to expect there since I am not running > yet. I have my exhaust Jet coated inside and out, and will have a shield > between the exhaust and intake. > > Ben > > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >