X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from outbound-mail.vgs.untd.com ([64.136.55.15] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with SMTP id 3745315 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:58:27 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.55.15; envelope-from=alwick@juno.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juno.com; s=alpha; t=1246755470; bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; l=0; h=Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:Content-Type:X-UNTD-OriginStamp; b=DJLuDCKO0dncJ9rh1TiUWIOIhdGAKzzw8C66l/2GJD8lEUlXXxJxkwlqqqpIz+hPF oQQ7IHUtu7Vh0JETnj08LhvQdsPLQDQLkpyxvEE7dOprHqDNS3EZIWXyz5Zb2sQrUc 8Rg77TG+LO1rrm0rkLMX+dvt/5P7mik6Mgtcb3i0= Received: from Penny (c-98-246-117-71.hsd1.or.comcast.net [98.246.117.71]) by smtpout02.vgs.untd.com with SMTP id AABFE98VCAPQ8MAS for (sender ); Sat, 4 Jul 2009 17:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: "Al Wick" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Corruption of EC settings Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 17:57:08 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0152_01C9FCD0.D9076F30" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18005 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18005 X-ContentStamp: 14:7:3073103110 X-MAIL-INFO: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 f1f139c8485dc5e8695dc14c256c3c896c256538dde8ace92d79196d0d6d0cd908cc21e5d5654c8d8dbd011d2d95492999 X-UNTD-OriginStamp: L941HVjjYzDhN3itp//mkJhgA/rbCX46eK8q9T6HgDwe9NSoavipIw== X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.181.42.32|smtpout02.vgs.untd.com|smtpout02.vgs.untd.com|alwick@juno.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0152_01C9FCD0.D9076F30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just want to point out that my analysis of the Vi-Pec is very = superficial. So far I find it particularly friendly to set up and = install. Some features are impressive compared to other units I've = installed. Definitely more robust (insensitive to variation). But there = is a lot that I don't know. It only qualifies as "something to consider" = for the rotary. When problem reports start coming in I can determine if = it's NOT a good product. I'll probably never know that it IS a good = product.=20 Guess that's the long way of saying: "I don't know"! -al wick ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ed Anderson=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2009 5:07 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Corruption of EC settings I admit, Al, that unit does have a boat load of features, flexibility = and capability - also agree, that true redundancy is very hard (and = generally expensive ) to achieve. To achieve something similar to your = two VIpec 88s from a redundancy perspective, I would have to get another = EC2. However, looking at all the capability and features of your unit, = I would hazard a guess that it might be a bit much for a neophyte to = deal with. =20 =20 But, the important thing is that the unit meet your criteria for safe, = worry-free flying. =20 Ed Anderson Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com http://www.andersonee.com http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html http://www.flyrotary.com/ http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW http://www.rotaryaviation.com/Rotorhead%20Truth.htm ------=_NextPart_000_0152_01C9FCD0.D9076F30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just want to point out that my analysis = of the=20 Vi-Pec is very superficial. So far I find it particularly friendly to = set up and=20 install. Some features are impressive compared to other units I've = installed.=20 Definitely more robust (insensitive to variation). But there is a lot = that I=20 don't know. It only qualifies as "something to consider" for the rotary. = When=20 problem reports start coming in I can determine if it's NOT a good = product.=20 I'll probably never know that it IS a good product.
 
Guess that's the long way of saying: "I = don't=20 know"!
 
-al wick
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Ed=20 Anderson
Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2009 = 5:07=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Corruption of EC=20 settings

I admit, = Al, =20 that unit does have a boat load of features, flexibility and = capability =96 also=20 agree, that true redundancy is very hard (and generally expensive ) to = achieve.  To achieve something similar to your two VIpec 88s from = a=20 redundancy perspective, I would have to get another EC2.   = However,=20 looking at all the capability and features of your unit, I would = hazard a=20 guess that it might be a bit much for a neophyte to deal with. =20  

 

But, the = important=20 thing is that the unit meet your criteria for safe,  worry-free=20 flying.

 

Ed=20 Anderson

Rv-6A N494BW=20 Rotary Powered

Matthews,=20 NC

eanderson@carolina.rr.com

http://www.andersonee.com

http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html<= /FONT>

http://www.flyrotary.com/

http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW

http://www.rotaryaviation.com/Rotorhead%20Truth.htm

 
------=_NextPart_000_0152_01C9FCD0.D9076F30--