Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.166.167] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0)
  with HTTP id 1848382 for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:29:34 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: interesting discussion on intake temp and
 fuel delivery.
To: flyrotary
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:29:34 -0500
Message-ID: <web-1848382@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <004601c27fcd$463e33a0$284ffea9@suwanneevalley.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Tracy Crook" <lors01@msn.com>:

I agree with Ed's assessment and if you put the air temp sensor after the
turbo & intercooler, it should compensate for the temp changes when running
conservative levels of boost (not over 15" Hg boost , 45" Hg MAP).
Just my opinion, but I think it is a mistake to be pushing the envelope too
far on boost in an aircraft installation until you get many other details
sorted out.  If you are an expert on turbo installations in rotaries, feel
free to ignore this advice.

Tracy Crook