X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost06.isp.att.net ([204.127.217.106] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3678434 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:15:11 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.217.106; envelope-from=bbradburry@bellsouth.net Received: from desktop (adsl-146-122-128.mco.bellsouth.net[72.146.122.128]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc06) with SMTP id <20090610201434H0600hk2cde>; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:14:34 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [72.146.122.128] From: "Bill Bradburry" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Injectors quandary. Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:14:45 -0400 Message-ID: <6B8FFF7A7BA34685BEB27BC15536F70B@Desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcnqBVw8YF179w34Txi76OZT8DHEhQAAkIrA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 Hmmm, That says that the 550 and 1600 injectors are good for over 650 HP!! The "V" in Velocity must stand for Vertical take off! :>) Bill B -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Dale Rogers Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:54 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Injectors quandary. Chris, There was a lot of traffic on this subject in 2003. IIRC Ed Anderson was/is using MSD injectors (2012?). Dunno if they will fit the Mistral manifold, though. Some interesting info here: http://www.robietherobot.com/Storm/fuelinjectorguide.htm and here: http://www.importperformanceparts.net/imports/accelfuelinj-choose.html HTH, Dale R. > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] > On Behalf Of Christopher Barber > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:38 PM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Injectors quandary. > > The list is WAY too quiet. So, I thought I would pose this concern/question. > > I am wanting to get new/rebuilt injectors. I tried to get some a > while back and ordered 4 Mazda injectors. It was at this time I > discovered that the stock Mazda injectors do NOT fit the Mistral > intake. My former build helper originally found the injectors I have > been using. The are seriously mismatched at about 550 cfm and 1600 > cfm. I know the EC2 can compensate (perhaps with some difficulty due > to the extreme difference), but I am wanting to replace them all with about 550ish injectors. > Perhaps it will help some of my leaning issues, perhaps not.. > > I am having a couple of issues. First, getting the right PHYSICAL > size. While the ones I am using in the Mistral Intake look a great > deal like the Mazda injectors, they are different in physical dimensions. > The ones I have come back with a Chrysler (Deko) and Ford Part > numbers, but seem to be very old part numbers have been difficult to > find online (my local auto shop and speed shop has been no help...I > seem to know more than they do about the topic even though they did try to help). > Are there "standard" known physical types with some kind of verbiage > that will allow me to get the proper fit? Or do I use my calipers, go > for the couple of sets I have found with dimensional drawings, order > them and hope for the proper fit? I just do not know the "standards" > used and I yet been unable to find the answer online....gee, I may > have to resort to live persons in an auto electrical shop . Some > of the injectors seems short and stubby and some long and > skinny...some, indistinguishable to the untrained eye, like the different ones I have now. > > I know, due to my ignorance, I may be making this harder than it is, > but hey, it is part of the learning. > > SECOND. Since I am ordering new injectors anyway, I am curious about > the impedance. The current ones are low impedance. Thus, I am using > the resistors in series with each injector. I know the EC2 does not > seem to mind this at all, however, since I am replacing them, is it > wise to remove this minor failure point (the connections to the > resistors > etc) and buy high impedance injectors and remove the resistors? Does > one have a significant advantage over the other? Seems if you can > reduce the parts count (heh, like in the rotary), it may be better. > > Thanks guys. Hope this helps pick up list activity a bit too. > > All the best, > > Chris > Houston > > -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html