X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from QMTA12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.27.227] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3678363 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:08:55 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.27.227; envelope-from=cbarber@texasattorney.net Received: from OMTA11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.36]) by QMTA12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2K5U1c00C0mlR8UACK8LPC; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:08:20 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.5] ([98.200.105.92]) by OMTA11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2K8J1c00l1zdwnW8XK8KJq; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:08:20 +0000 Message-ID: <4A3004A5.302@TexasAttorney.net> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:08:21 -0500 From: Christopher Barber User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Injectors quandary. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mistral has been no help in the past. While I believe they have good intent, they are, my guess is, very busy. Past emails have gone unanswered a number of times and no documentation was included. We did buy it knowing there was NO support and that is what we have gotten I think that avenue will not provide solutions. All the best, Chris Jeff Whaley wrote: > Hey Chris, what does Mistral have to say? > They designed the intake; they must have a recommended injector. > That's where I'd start ... hopefully they can help. > Jeff > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Christopher Barber > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:38 PM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Injectors quandary. > > The list is WAY too quiet. So, I thought I would pose this concern/question. > > I am wanting to get new/rebuilt injectors. I tried to get some a while > back and ordered 4 Mazda injectors. It was at this time I discovered > that the stock Mazda injectors do NOT fit the Mistral intake. My former > build helper originally found the injectors I have been using. The are > seriously mismatched at about 550 cfm and 1600 cfm. I know the EC2 can > compensate (perhaps with some difficulty due to the extreme difference), > but I am wanting to replace them all with about 550ish injectors. > Perhaps it will help some of my leaning issues, perhaps not.. > > I am having a couple of issues. First, getting the right PHYSICAL > size. While the ones I am using in the Mistral Intake look a great deal > like the Mazda injectors, they are different in physical dimensions. > The ones I have come back with a Chrysler (Deko) and Ford Part numbers, > but seem to be very old part numbers have been difficult to find online > (my local auto shop and speed shop has been no help...I seem to know > more than they do about the topic even though they did try to help). > Are there "standard" known physical types with some kind of verbiage > that will allow me to get the proper fit? Or do I use my calipers, go > for the couple of sets I have found with dimensional drawings, order > them and hope for the proper fit? I just do not know the "standards" > used and I yet been unable to find the answer online....gee, I may have > to resort to live persons in an auto electrical shop . Some of the > injectors seems short and stubby and some long and skinny...some, > indistinguishable to the untrained eye, like the different ones I have now. > > I know, due to my ignorance, I may be making this harder than it is, but > hey, it is part of the learning. > > SECOND. Since I am ordering new injectors anyway, I am curious about > the impedance. The current ones are low impedance. Thus, I am using > the resistors in series with each injector. I know the EC2 does not > seem to mind this at all, however, since I am replacing them, is it wise > to remove this minor failure point (the connections to the resistors > etc) and buy high impedance injectors and remove the resistors? Does > one have a significant advantage over the other? Seems if you can > reduce the parts count (heh, like in the rotary), it may be better. > > Thanks guys. Hope this helps pick up list activity a bit too. > > All the best, > > Chris > Houston > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > >