Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.70] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2751450 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:21:48 -0500 Received: from rad ([66.156.196.17]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031119152147.XLES20840.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rad> for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:21:47 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Renesis single rotor Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:21:28 -0600 Message-ID: <02b001c3aeb0$ce25d990$6001a8c0@rad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02B1_01C3AE7E.838B6990" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_02B1_01C3AE7E.838B6990 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I may not write a lot at this time, but the RES12 and RES13 will not go away.=20 In addition to using my AVID as a test bed, I think the second engine = will go into a SONEX. =20 =20 Hi Richard. I didn't mean to imply that the Renesis single would be any improvement over the engines that you're working on now. In fact, it = could very well end up being heavier. I was just excited to see someone who = was already working on making a single out of a Renesis. With the work that you, and others are doing, I think the single rotor may finally catch = on. =20 =20 I believe the rotary engine will only perform superior if used with a constant speed(in flight adjustable) prop. Fortunately, there are two = props in the power range available, these are the Italian QUINTI and the = Airmaster from Newseeland.=20 The prices seem to be reasonable. =20 Richard Sohn=20 =20 I guess that's an added bonus of getting the power down to the range = where these props will work. Keep those great ideas comin' :-) =20 Thanks, Rusty =20 ------=_NextPart_000_02B1_01C3AE7E.838B6990 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
I may not write a lot at this time, but = the RES12=20 and RES13 will not go away.
In addition to using my AVID as a = test bed, I=20 think the second engine will go into a SONEX.  
 
Hi Richard.  I didn't mean to imply that = the=20 Renesis single would be any improvement over the engines that you're = working on=20 now.  In fact, it could very well end up being heavier.  I was = just=20 excited to see someone who was already working on making a single out of = a=20 Renesis.  With the work that you, and others are doing, I think the = single=20 rotor may finally catch on. 
 
I believe the rotary engine will only = perform=20 superior if used with a constant speed(in flight adjustable) prop. = Fortunately,=20 there are two props in the power range available, these are the Italian = QUINTI=20 and the Airmaster from Newseeland.
The prices seem to be = reasonable.
 
Richard Sohn 
 
I guess that's an added bonus of getting the power down to the = range=20 where these props will work.  Keep those great ideas comin'=20 :-)
 
Thanks,
Rusty
 
------=_NextPart_000_02B1_01C3AE7E.838B6990--