Return-Path: <RJohn15183@aol.com>
Received: from imo-d05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.37] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
  with ESMTP id 2750616 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:31:28 -0500
Received: from RJohn15183@aol.com
	by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id q.84.1cb6de92 (16087)
	 for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:31:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from  aol.com (mow-m18.webmail.aol.com [64.12.180.134]) by air-id10.mx.aol.com (v97.8) with ESMTP id MAILINID104-3ed73fbac7de160; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:31:10 -0500
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:31:10 -0500
From: RJohn15183@aol.com
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net ("Rotary motors in aircraft")
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: inline twin engines?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <713DF831.1D521CC7.0BE7D1EB@aol.com>
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
X-AOL-IP: 206.223.103.254
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Here are some pictures of that lovely design. 

http://www.infortel.com/cozy/

Centerline thrust is THE way to go if you can get it and I really liked these guys approach to the problem. I think some smooth running rotaries would cure the cracking problems they had. I have written to them a couple of times but they never have replied. 

Rob

> They used piston car engines, saw the setup in OSH a while back.
> Marko
> 
> There were two brothers from Brazil (I think) that had two
>  A long time ago. But it did work fine.
> 
> Lynn E. Hanover