Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #43545
From: Paul Vermillion <paulo264@cox.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: 13B--- N/A vs. Turbo engine buildup?
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:43:00 -0500
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Al G, Mark, & others---Thanks for your inputs.     Paul & Don

 

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Al Gietzen
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 8:31 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 13B--- N/A vs. Turbo engine buildup?

 

Would there be a compression problem running it sans turbo? (Hearsay has it that it would be a "dog".) 

Definitely would not be a “dog”.  Best I could figure based on data that Mazda generated, at 5500-6000 rpm the 9.0 compression could be about 4% penalty vs 9.7.  More at lower rpm.  And that would be for WOT. If you run a 2.85 : 1 re-drive ratio and run 6500 -7000 it’s likely there is not a measurable difference.

Al G

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster