X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <rwstracy@gmail.com>
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.224] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.5)
  with ESMTP id 3041271 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:18:21 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.198.224; envelope-from=rwstracy@gmail.com
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so2767380rvb.7
        for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender
         :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references
         :x-google-sender-auth;
        bh=rjyUv9fvpJ3fwC7/p+qq1NKLn6IDo2Z+w6kKDgC0a2g=;
        b=Hk/5JewgORyEktRejd4c4xEUNWghLudQD6SwJfinridOAGhNAVJaHbC2bVckvqNcnr
         jUK+TMWO3YOiEhRVYsY4t2ECnzTMh5744bOkMSYKVKHq5KA8QW7ptgbTROH6Pj4spEZi
         iulGk25+NVkLjgwlPmeI23Pw/0FWSq5BkgGJU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=mXoohFLSiZOrRdM/BjgNITH8Uf2SmwbHpKamskS0I5WBxFWcxVD5JJr4xDTkU0ieLM
         gv9lRJWKTeOYyj7lC2n8U1Gvp+yEK722SshXkB7UZ1WIK+M6gtypPPL7D5k4M0HW6Y2P
         VYZSWXfmiGY8B1niNeQEOY8wLPDZb/3DA/fOk=
Received: by 10.141.71.8 with SMTP id y8mr594404rvk.63.1216952263086;
        Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.141.82.18 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1b4b137c0807241917j606443f5ud5e7c563ce3b6ccc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:17:43 -0400
From: "Tracy Crook" <tracy@rotaryaviation.com>
Sender: rwstracy@gmail.com
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] 13B--- N/A vs. Turbo engine buildup?
In-Reply-To: <list-3040990@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_111418_27768828.1216952263075"
References: <list-3040990@logan.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8bd62375b04e97e4

------=_Part_111418_27768828.1216952263075
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

The 86 - 88 NA engines were 9.4 CR engines, just .4 more than the 91
turbos.   I have no idea how that silly rumor about how turbo engines
sans-turbo would be a dog.  It is, of course,  nonsense.

Tracy

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Paul Vermillion <paulo264@cox.net> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> * *
> *Subject:* 13B--- N/A vs. Turbo engine buildup?
>
>
>
> To Everyone=97
>
>                 We have both a 13*b * NA (unknown vintage=9780's?) and a =
'91
> Turbo 13B engine and are just beginning their teardowns, both allegedly
> running but internal condition unknown.   Would there be any problem runn=
ing
> the Turbo engine (BUT *NOT* with the turbo setup-- *AS IF* it were a NA
> engine)?  Is it a "stronger" engine than the NA?  Would it need a differe=
nt
> Timing setup?  Would there be a compression problem running it sans turbo=
?
> (Hearsay has it that it would be a "dog".)  If some of the individual par=
ts
> spec out to be better in one engine but not in the other, would there be =
any
> problem/advantage in "mixing & matching" the various parts in the newly
> built up engine, i.e., rotaries, side plates, eccentric shaft, etc?   We
> would appreciate your inputs.    Thanks!
>
>
>
> Paul & Don Vermillion
>

------=_Part_111418_27768828.1216952263075
Content-Type: text/html; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>The 86 - 88 NA engines were 9.4 CR engines, just .4 m=
ore than the 91 turbos.&nbsp;&nbsp; I have no idea how that silly rumor abo=
ut how turbo engines sans-turbo would be a dog.&nbsp; It is, of course, &nb=
sp;nonsense.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Tracy<br><br></div>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Paul Vermillion=
 &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:paulo264@cox.net">paulo264@cox.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br=
>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0=
px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div lang=3D"EN-US" link=3D"blue" vlink=3D"purple">
<div>
<p><span style=3D"COLOR: #1f497d">&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style=3D"COLOR: #1f497d">&nbsp;</span></p>
<div>
<div style=3D"BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b=
5c4df 1pt solid; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT: mediu=
m none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none">
<p><b><span style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt">&nbsp;</span></b><span style=3D"FONT-=
SIZE: 10pt"><br><b>Subject:</b> 13B--- N/A vs. Turbo engine buildup?</span>=
</p></div></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>To Everyone=97</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; We have both a 13<b>b </b>&nbsp;NA (unknown vintage=9780=
's?) and a '91 Turbo 13B engine and are just beginning their teardowns, bot=
h allegedly running but internal condition unknown.&nbsp;&nbsp; Would there=
 be any problem running the Turbo engine (BUT <u>NOT</u> with the turbo set=
up-- <u>AS IF</u> it were a NA engine)?&nbsp; Is it a "stronger" engine tha=
n the NA? &nbsp;Would it need a different Timing setup?&nbsp; Would there b=
e a compression problem running it sans turbo? (Hearsay has it that it woul=
d be a "dog".)&nbsp; If some of the individual parts spec out to be better =
in one engine but not in the other, would there be any problem/advantage in=
 "mixing &amp; matching" the various parts in the newly built up engine, i.=
e., rotaries, side plates, eccentric shaft, etc?&nbsp;&nbsp; We would appre=
ciate your inputs.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;Thanks!</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Paul &amp; Don Vermillion</p></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

------=_Part_111418_27768828.1216952263075--