Return-Path: Received: from smtp800.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.142] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with SMTP id 2750055 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:04:44 -0500 Received: from adsl-208-191-163-70.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net (HELO locb1) (cjbarber@swbell.net@208.191.163.70 with login) by smtp1.bt.mail.vip.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Nov 2003 17:04:39 -0000 From: "Christopher Barber" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: potential single rotor aircraft Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:11:27 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0224_01C3ADC4.B5FC1E20" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0224_01C3ADC4.B5FC1E20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Velocity has been building a twin prototype for a while now. However, it keeps getting pushed to the back of the shop as other matters become more pressing . There is a picture of the scale model they had at Osh last year on my website. The engines are on the wings/strakes. They were considering the Jaburu engine, but, from what I understand that new engine is having some issues (donno what). I mentioned the rotary to them....they were polite If interested the link to the shots on my builders site is www.lonestarvelocity.com then go to the links menu. On the links menu go to the bottom and select "The Modified Velocity "Firefly & Twin Velocity Model (Osh Kosh '02). The twin model is the bottom two pictures....Sorry, my webpage is screwing up and the "click to enlarge" is taking you to the wrong picture. I will try to correct, but don't know when I will get a chance....ok, don't know when I will get in the mood to screw with it ;). All the best, Chris Christopher Barber Christopher Barber Elder & Disability Attorney & Counselor at Law -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of CCI Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:02 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: potential single rotor aircraft At 10:17 AM 11/18/2003 -0600, you wrote: I feel a little guilty for letting it collect so much dust, but I don't feel quite that guilty yet. Fred Thanks for the info Fred. When you finally feel too guilty of neglecting that Starlet project, just bring it on down to me :-) Rusty ------=_NextPart_000_0224_01C3ADC4.B5FC1E20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Velocity=20 has been building a twin prototype for a while now. However, it keeps = getting=20 pushed to the back of the shop as other matters become more pressing = . =20 There is a picture of the scale model they had at Osh last year on my=20 website.  The engines are on the wings/strakes.  They were = considering=20 the Jaburu engine, but, from what I understand that new engine is having = some=20 issues (donno what).  I mentioned the rotary to them....they were = polite=20 <g> 
 
If=20 interested the link to the shots on my builders site is www.lonestarvelocity.com = then go to=20 the links menu. On the links menu go to the bottom and select "The = Modified=20 Velocity "Firefly & Twin Velocity Model (Osh Kosh '02).  The = twin model=20 is the bottom two pictures....Sorry, my webpage is screwing up and the = "click to=20 enlarge" is taking you to the wrong picture.  I will try to = correct, but=20 don't know when I will get a chance....ok, don't know when I will get in = the=20 mood to screw with it ;).
 
All the=20 best,
 
Chris
 

 

Christopher=20 Barber

Christopher=20 Barber

Elder &=20 Disability  Attorney & Counselor at Law

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in = aircraft=20 [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of = CCI
Sent:=20 Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:02 AM
To: Rotary motors in=20 aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: potential single rotor=20 aircraft

At 10:17 AM 11/18/2003 -0600, you = wrote:
I feel a little = guilty for=20 letting it collect so much dust, but I don't feel quite that guilty = yet.=20 Fred
 
Thanks for the info Fred.  When you finally = feel too=20 guilty of neglecting that Starlet project, just bring it on down to = me=20 :-)
 
Rusty
------=_NextPart_000_0224_01C3ADC4.B5FC1E20--