Return-Path: Received: from imo-m02.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP id 2720547 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:59:12 -0500 Received: from DLOMHEIM@aol.com by imo-m02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id q.196.22692d65 (4116) for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:59:03 -0500 (EST) From: DLOMHEIM@aol.com Message-ID: <196.22692d65.2ce42347@aol.com> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:59:03 EST Subject: HS Port Barrel Valve Modifications To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_196.22692d65.2ce42347_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10708 --part1_196.22692d65.2ce42347_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I did an archive search and couldn't find an answer to my question...in Bruce T's O.H. video it looks like he places putty direactly into the housing vs. into the barrel valve as Tracy mentions in his book. Is there a reason why we can't eliminate the barrel all together and modify (putty) the end housings directly (as the video seems to show)? Thanks for the info. Doug Lomheim RV-9"R" --part1_196.22692d65.2ce42347_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I did an archive search a= nd couldn't find an answer to my question...in Bruce T's O.H. video it looks= like he places putty direactly into the housing vs. into the barrel valve a= s Tracy mentions in his book.  Is there a reason why we can't eliminate= the barrel all together and modify (putty) the end housings directly (as th= e video seems to show)?  Thanks for the info.

Doug Lomheim
RV-9"R"  






--part1_196.22692d65.2ce42347_boundary--