X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.251] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.2) with ESMTP id 2879276 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:26:56 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.132.251; envelope-from=rwstracy@gmail.com Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b38so137171ana.81 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:26:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=IHQiA9YV3RFHCtL2Q2Xd37QxqpYdeFKQik3gIWY2PEQ=; b=RtvV6kAsXy/bZT3JivnvmfoeZIPgPtvRd+U0Od4fAGBs6b0FjlytAtAcq+A9QQbiLUc3njuojpHlHfJ18ohogDsXvWed+ejD3QVU+jqBxkXxIafeSA6prk1q19oEAvfPg6qRc5KbM5fytOnr8TaE9vySChqJIZTv2DCxzPrAwZo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Uid+5MWWdi9KSoFxJMLdpz19m9Rk0KdG/GfESt/e9p7/wWMx0tklPoCwzgb0qBKxhkVtzdQZTzUotnX4iek0XMUGMPUWEjMPHMuKG1MOhdWtbwTVtHfmBTDm0e9ZjAXJ7FCIppEvaYWdkUYCvqEvMu4xvfgjdOn6VSxCFeKdWYM= Received: by 10.100.4.1 with SMTP id 1mr2324466and.77.1209601576950; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:26:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.133.10 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:26:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b4b137c0804301726u364b60ccjbad291ea751ee3a1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:26:16 -0400 From: "Tracy Crook" Sender: rwstracy@gmail.com To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Post Mortum on RD-1B In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5896_2510396.1209601576936" References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8a7bdfde84ad9a5c ------=_Part_5896_2510396.1209601576936 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Dave, You might expect the hub or engine to freewheel at some point but this can manifest itself in several ways. The sungear is a Ford part and the amount of interference fit varies a lot due to the tolerances in the sungear ID. The original design of the input shaft used just an interference / heat-shrink fit until I learned that the gear ID was not consistent enough for a reliable fit. At the low end of the interference fit the engine and/or prop might freewheel but the most likely scenarioo is a momentary slip followed by the shaft friction welding itself to the sun gear. This can happen with amazing suddenness. I experienced this in-flight during initial development of the drive before the gear was mechanically pinned to the input shaft. It took several flights during which I was sure that the engine had a sudden severe 'miss' at full throttle before I concluded that the engine was not at fault. Inspection of the drive revealed the sun gear had spun on the input shaft. Tracy On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 9:09 PM, David Staten wrote: > Tracy, > Thanks for the comprehensive write up. > > Given the lack of other similar failures being discussed in the past, I > am dismayed to know this is likely an assembly error on our part. I > performed the original assembly and mating, but the oil seal leak developed > at some point in the first couple hours, at which point the assembly was > demated, seal replaced, and assembly remated. > > The "shearing then welding on shaft" event, wouldnt this at some point > been associated with a motionless or freewheeling hub? I never saw any > episodes of this during the engine testing sessions in which i was present. > Granted I was not present for a significant portion of the engine runs, > including none after the reassembly. > > Dave Staten > > ------=_Part_5896_2510396.1209601576936 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Hi Dave,
  You might expect the hub or engine to freewheel at some point but this can manifest itself in several ways.  The sungear is a Ford part and the amount of interference fit varies a lot due to the tolerances in the sungear ID.  The original design of the input shaft used just an interference / heat-shrink fit until I learned that the gear ID was not consistent enough for a reliable fit.
  At the low end of the interference fit the engine and/or prop might freewheel but the most likely scenarioo is a momentary slip followed by the shaft friction welding itself to the sun gear.  This can happen with amazing suddenness.  I experienced this in-flight during initial development of the drive before the gear was mechanically pinned to the input shaft.  It took several flights during which I was sure that the engine had a sudden severe 'miss' at full throttle before I concluded that the engine was not at fault.  Inspection of the drive revealed the sun gear had spun on the input shaft. 
 
Tracy

On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 9:09 PM, David Staten <Dastaten@earthlink.net> wrote:
Tracy,
  Thanks for the comprehensive write up.

  Given the lack of other similar failures being discussed in the past, I am dismayed to know this is likely an assembly error on our part. I performed the original assembly and mating, but the oil seal leak developed at some point in the first couple hours, at which point the assembly was demated, seal replaced, and assembly remated.

  The "shearing then welding on shaft" event, wouldnt this at some point been associated with a motionless or freewheeling hub? I never saw any episodes of this during the engine testing sessions in which i was present. Granted I was not present for a significant portion of the engine runs, including none after the reassembly.

Dave Staten

------=_Part_5896_2510396.1209601576936--