X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [209.85.198.247] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.2) with ESMTP id 2874328 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:38:35 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.198.247; envelope-from=bartrim@gmail.com Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k29so2408357rvb.7 for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:37:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole:importance:in-reply-to; bh=IZWjblks8en6qUZw6nsyHftpPzBe0Bpy5Cne72PS630=; b=Nvr1YNPn2kKjvnEetjkb7gY/sfUhnmv0shxbAsHf0q5eK8tobz5W9GBAyyeWfH9jEyb1zI9odHmq8hSOy6vQrohW5MZfV8LuqHrOIXfCfEy3krLSGZzz7GabKyjZ9qpDx6SyE/XCwqKZ8LJJEgFQUAamHQmmeNw7avfAyV92fUI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole:importance:in-reply-to; b=jVoIv9C1IUB8s45bpriPbPO0hc/TvM2d9dgrbkX06Dju4d7j2iJ+sv6OpkCqqX0vYyCCb99KY1IKYXO0DOnkyQIG4j+hbwGFO1nG79ZX/6RfV1lefSJrT3i43mYymTxo7rRWSSpcqVBzimgKpcTpuxFeHH2KmjwXw5NT5AOT/mU= Received: by 10.141.87.13 with SMTP id p13mr1079999rvl.62.1209317875608; Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from Endurance ( [198.162.160.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k41sm5159866rvb.4.2008.04.27.10.37.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:37:55 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Bartrim" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Electric Water pumps - Interesting Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:37:39 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003B_01C8A852.B7096510" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C8A852.B7096510 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I think Ed is just trying to egg me on, knowing the attachment I have to this subject:-). Referring to Bob who reported marginal cooling with his EWP, it would have been nice to know how the system would perform with a mechanical pump. I'm satisfied with the performance of my Davis Craig EWP, even though it is somewhat marginal on hot days during a 3 minute 2000fpm climbout with boost. But I doubt the mechanical pump would do any better. I'd like to improve my cooling system, starting with my hailstorm damaged evap cores, but I'm still committed to using my EWP. I guess until we can get a true experimental minded type of guy who already has a successful mechanical cooled system, to switch over to an EWP with no other system modifications, then we will never really answer this question. Gee Ed, you sound bored... It'd be a great way to pass the summer? Todd Bartrim Turbo 13B RV9 -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Russell Duffy Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 8:12 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Electric Water pumps - Interesting I was just thumbing through a recent catalog from Summit Racing and came across a couple of pages on electric water pumps. There has always been a degree of interest (and some debate {:>)) regarding the use of electric water pumps in aircraft. Are you really that bored Ed? Maybe trying to stir up some lively conversation, and tired of the same old fuse breaker topic :-) I'm off to run the single rotor again, now that I've got the RD-1C drive back on it. Don't tell anyone, but it's only got an electric water pump :-0 Rusty (blah, blah, blah, I'm not listening, blah, blah ) ------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C8A852.B7096510 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

I = think Ed is just trying to egg me on, knowing the attachment I have to this = subjectJ.

        = ;    Referring to Bob who reported marginal cooling with his EWP, it would have been = nice to know how the system would perform with a mechanical pump. I’m = satisfied with the performance of my Davis Craig EWP, even though it is somewhat = marginal on hot days during a 3 minute 2000fpm climbout with boost. But I doubt the mechanical pump would do any better. I’d like to improve my = cooling system, starting with my hailstorm damaged evap cores, but I’m still = committed to using my EWP.

        = ;    I guess until we can get a true experimental minded type of guy who = already has a successful mechanical cooled system, to switch over to an EWP with no = other system modifications, then we will never really answer this = question.

        = ;    Gee Ed, you sound bored... It’d be a great way to pass the = summer?

 

Todd Bartrim<= o:p>

Turbo 13B = RV9

<= span class=3DEmailStyle15> 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in = aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Russell Duffy
Sent: Sunday, April 27, = 2008 8:12 AM
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Electric Water pumps - Interesting

 

I was just thumbing through a recent catalog from Summit = Racing and came across a couple of pages on electric water = pumps.  There has always been a degree of interest (and some debate {:>)) regarding the = use of electric water pumps in aircraft.   <= /p>

 <= /p>

Are you really = that bored Ed?  Maybe trying to stir up some lively conversation, and tired of = the same old fuse breaker topic :-)  <= /p>

 <= /p>

I'm off to run = the single rotor again, now that I've got the RD-1C drive back on it.  = Don't tell anyone, but it's only got an electric water pump = :-0<= /p>

 <= /p>

Rusty (blah, = blah, blah, I'm not listening, blah, blah <g>)<= /p>

 <= /p>

 <= /p>

------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C8A852.B7096510--