X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.0) with ESMTP id 2724806 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:33:25 -0500 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.148; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2008 11:32:37 -0500 Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m1BGWasf024513 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:32:36 -0500 Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id m1BGWLIi020537 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:32:36 GMT Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:32:17 -0500 Received: from [64.102.38.143] ([64.102.38.143]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:32:17 -0500 Message-ID: <47B07898.5060908@nc.rr.com> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:32:24 -0500 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Rotor 'slinging'; was Rotor Weight Codes References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Feb 2008 16:32:17.0477 (UTC) FILETIME=[AA808750:01C86CCB] Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=echristley@nc.rr.com; dkim=neutral Phil White wrote: > This all results in a 'slinging' movement of the rotor, both up and > down and sideways, but it is all smoothly circular; no starting and > stopping like a piston. The original point I was trying to make was that just 1/4" lb at 2000RPM would make large forces. Please forgive me for mentioning "reciprocating". I understand that it is a fighting word around here 8*). It isn't reciprocating, it is an off-center spin. But as my washing machine with its weak springs demonstrates, an off-center spin can still shake the house. Washing polyester shirts, instead of cotton jeans, makes the shaking much less.