> Hi > Following on from this thin vs thick radiator discussion. What's the
> general consensus on placement of the heat exchanger/s? Seems to me the
> most efficient WW11 planes had the exchangers mounted under the wing or
> fuselage but nearly everyone here is placing them under the cowl, is the
> reason for this just because its an easier installation to make, or is
> it no less efficient at our power/speed.
> My aim is to minimize total drag even if it means a longer build time to
> get the installation correct, current thoughts are to place a short
> thick coolant exchanger under the fuselage and have a clean tight
> fitting cowl with only inlets for induction and oil heat exchanger,
> hopefully there will be enough air going through the oil exchanger to
> keep under cowl temps reasonable. > Am I just plane crazy?
> Regards Andrew Martin.
Andrew, The extra plumbing seems to be one problem.
George ( down under)
--
Homepage:
http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html