Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.252.48; envelope-from=finn.lassen@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:23:56 -0400
From: Finn Lassen <finn.lassen@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Rotary Cross Country Report
In-reply-to: <list-2440859@logan.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message-id: <4727E73C.1040508@verizon.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <list-2440859@logan.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

Ed, is there any possible way that the injectors can be made to flow 
more or less fuel due to turbo charging?
But I guess any "back pressure" from the turbocharged air would be 
insignificant compared to the fuel pressure...

Finn

Ed Anderson wrote:
> Hi Dave, glad you made it.  Yes, really made it a gloomy week on my 
> end thinking about all the fun all you folks were having while I kept 
> pulling the curtains back looking at the ceiling {:>)
>  
> Thanks for the data,  I'll look into the fuel calibration procedure 
> again.  I would normally expect it to settle down by now.  Tell me 
> once again the flow rate of your primary and secondary injectors, then 
> I'll go back and look to see if I perhaps screwed up the calculation.  
> I would normally expect to see the error being less than 0.5 gallons 
> out of a 37 gallon tank of fuel.  Naturally, the process depends on 
> accuracy in measuring input, but most tank pumps are pretty good.  
> More importantly, I would expect it to stabilize, so need to look into it.
>  
> It looks like an average of about 2.35 gallons per fill-up ranging 
> from an error of 3.8 gallons to 0.8 gallons and I know we can do 
> better than that.
>  
>  
>  
> Ed
>