X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from misav10.sasknet.sk.ca ([142.165.20.174] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with ESMTP id 2435819 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:19:01 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=142.165.20.174; envelope-from=hjjohnson@sasktel.net Received: from bgmpomr1.sasknet.sk.ca ([142.165.72.22]) by misav10 with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:18:20 -0600 Received: from sasktel.net ([192.168.234.97]) by bgmpomr1.sasknet.sk.ca (SaskTel eMessaging Service) with ESMTP id <0JQK00CP4YQK5H00@bgmpomr1.sasknet.sk.ca> for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:18:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.234.24] (Forwarded-For: [71.17.120.171]) by cgmail1.sasknet.sk.ca (mshttpd); Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:18:20 -0600 Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:18:20 -0600 From: H & J Johnson Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Bud Warren- Geardrives .com To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-id: <10dfd3c72ddc.47231e7c@sasktel.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.20 (built Feb 27 2006) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal

John, I know it may be more difficult, however wasn't there just

a discussion recently about it and the censous was to

go to SkySmith? I'm wondering if they ment their own

setup was un-insurable..[V-8 and their PSRU]. It

should be clear that, that doesn't nesc apply to

"experimental's" as it's written in the article.When

you read it in the article, it reads as if they mean

"all experimentals". It's just negitive publicity that

doesn't reflect the real situation.

Not that it matters at this point..

Best..

Jarrett

> Jarrett, Avemco said no, EAA said call after 15 hours, so there
> are two sources. JohnD
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: H & J Johnson
> To: Rotary motors in aircraft
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 11:34 PM
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Bud Warren- Geardrives .com
>
>
>
>
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Bud Warren- Geardrives .com
>
>
> > Bobby J. Hughes wrote:
> > > Looks like Bud Warren and two passengers survived an
> emergency
> > landing
> > > this week. Plane was lost. He had a very nice aircraft and a
> > 4000 fpm
> > > climb.
> > >
> http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/5230574.html
> > >
> > > http://www.geareddrives.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > *Bobby J Hughes*
> > >
> >
> > Wow, talk about getting back into the saddle quickly! I'm
> pretty
> > certain that it was Bud who was giving a presentation on his
> gear
> > drive this morning at Copperstate.
> >
> > Dale R.
> >
>
>
> Anyone else notice in the write-up that they claim experimental
> airplanes
> are un-insurable? I'm not sure where they are getting their
> fact's from
>
> but I think someone should set them straight.
>
>
>
> Jarrett Johnson
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
>
> Archive and UnSub:
> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html