Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #39712
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Variable Length Intake Experiment
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 09:42:45 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Yes, the nickel coating was to aid in the tubes sliding - that turned out OK in the end and it did help the mechanism move the tubes in and out easily.  However, after experimenting with 4 tubes (ideal) and unable to keep them aligned and sliding without binding, I merged the primary and secondary of each rotor into one runner (using a Webber manifold) and so ended up with only 2 tubes moving.  While this solved the mechanical problem, it killed the DIE effect I was trying to capitalize on because the sharp 180 deg turn at the throttle body reflected most of the pulse energy rather than permitting it to travel around the bend and pressurize the other rotor's intake port.
 
Attached is a photo of the In-flight-adjustable intake at its extended (left photo) and retracted (right photo) positions.  The small black box on the left was the controller with a motor on the bottom of the intake and connected to a screw rod which ran through a nut on the upper portion and move the top part up and down.  It had limit switches so I wouldn't unintentionally run the top part off of its interface with the lower part.
 
If you are going to build a system that has tubes sliding within tubes, make certain you use 6063-T832 Drawn Aluminum Tubing (Round) which is drawn (rather than 6061 extruded tubing) which makes it more dimensional precise and is designed for telescoping.  Here is a source I found for it  http://www.texastowers.com/aluminum.htm
 
 
So in the end,  I reverted back to my original DIE design - often times referred to as the "Dynamic Chamber" intake, although I use no dynamic chamber in my design as it is not needed for aircraft rpm.
 
I get between 6000-6200 rpm static  depending on OAT with a 74x88" prop using my current manifold which gives me between 175 - 185 HP for take off.  Since I do not fly at max power during cruise, I decided the benefit I was aiming for using the in-flight-adjustable manifold would be of minimum benefit. So I terminated efforts on the in-flight adjustable manifold.  Now,  I adjust my intake length twice a year, once for summer month flying and one for winter.  Works well for me.
 
Ed.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott" <squiggles@yahoo.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 9:00 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: ATTENTION YOU ARE AT RISK...

*uncomfortable silence*
Well....Ummmmmmm....Aaaaaa....
Hmmmmmmmm....

I thought it didnt work very well, something with the nickel coating and motor drive...
So you got everything worked out?

Understood about the plugs up, I was interested in how the sliding tubes are sealed and the drive mechanism...


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us.
http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7


--
Homepage: 
http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster