Return-Path: Received: from relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.36] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2637686 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:21:43 -0400 Received: (qmail 17902 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2003 14:21:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frontiernet.net) ([170.215.97.8]) (envelope-sender ) by relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.6) with SMTP for ; 15 Oct 2003 14:21:42 -0000 Message-ID: <3F8D4A17.F7A7C129@frontiernet.net> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:22:31 -0400 From: Jim Sower X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP - series pumps and wacky ideas References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A device like that would be interesting to have in a lot of places. Like measuring current to fuel pumps as a take on their state of repair. Wouldn't it be nice to have several of these and other sensors working in "background" on another "page" of my engine monitor that I could peek at from time to time. Ain't technology wonnerful ... Jim S. John Slade wrote: > > It would be relatively trivial to design a circuit that uses current > > sensing to detect pump failure. Current to the pump that falls either > > above or below the design window can be used to trigger an alarm or > > activate the backup. Response would be nearly instant. > > Relatively trivial to you, perhaps. Current sensing sounds like a great way > to spot a fuel or water pump failure, or even potential for failure. I > managed to build an RST intercom that sorta works. Could I build one of > these gizmos? What would be involved? > John Slade (electronically challenged, but keen to learn) > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html -- Jim Sower Crossville, TN; Chapter 5 Long-EZ N83RT, Velocity N4095T