Return-Path: Received: from relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.34] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2637033 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:46:43 -0400 Received: (qmail 21523 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2003 01:46:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frontiernet.net) ([170.215.97.8]) (envelope-sender ) by relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.6) with SMTP for ; 15 Oct 2003 01:46:42 -0000 Message-ID: <3F8C991C.1839AD96@frontiernet.net> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 20:47:24 -0400 From: Jim Sower X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP - series pumps and wacky ideas References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rusty, I think you might be overestimating how fast things will heat up with a pump failure. If it was me, I'd do a little testing - start at cruise at altitude - and shut off the pump and see what happens and how fast. I think the temps will rise slowly enough to give you plenty of time to turn on the backup in case of failure of the primary. Next thing I would do is drive my coolant alert alarms with coolant pressure. I believe that in case of primary failure, the coolant pressure will start rising a good bit before the temp [readings]. Next, if the (95C) thermal switch proved reliable and accurate, I would have one for each pump. That way, I could always fly with one pump on, one on standby. Perhaps there would be only 3 positions on the switch: Bypass, ON (controlled), and Standby (using controller, but through the temp switch). An OFF position would be my fourth choice and would involve a funky switch. In any event, having done the above, I would test both pumps on the ground and fly using one as primary and the other as backup. I'd alternate pumps either every couple of hours during a flight, or pump #1 as primary on odd numbered days and pump #2 on even numbered days. I would occasionally switch from one to the other in [steady state cruise] flight to ensure that the controllers are maintaining the same temp. I would make myself a master-switch-bypass that would leave the primary pump running for 10 mins or so after engine shutdown so as to prevent internal boiling that forces coolant into the overflow bottle and having to be sucked back into the system later. I think EWPs are going to be HUGE. And sooner rather than later. But I think failures are not going to cause problems nearly as fast as folks are speculating now. When's the last time you had a water pump belt failure on your car? It ran for one hell of a lot longer than six seconds. That's what I think .... Jim S.