Return-Path: Received: from [24.93.67.83] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2635661 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 18:30:11 -0400 Received: from jandre2 (rrcs-midsouth-24-199-153-209.biz.rr.com [24.199.153.209]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id h9DMUA9j004919 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 18:30:10 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: From: "Jeffery J. Andre'" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP - series pumps and wacky ideas Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:55:46 -0400 Message-ID: <5F5AB7DF77ACD511849A00B0D0F91C8A16051E@SL1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-reply-to: <5F5AB7DF77ACD511849A00B0D0F91C8A263E03@SL1> Importance: Normal > Does anyone know with any accuracy how fuel pumps fail? I > >doubt they fail catastrophically. I suspect they fail by degrees > >(probably very gradually as the poorly maintained filter clogs up). My experience with two electric fuel pump failures (one GM, one Jeep). They both started making a substantial amount of noise (high pitched whine) which increased in volume over about a two-three weeks time, after which they failed completely (siezed). I assumed from that behaviour that one failure mode for these things is bearing failure, and that you do get some fairly obvious warning with plenty of time to do something about it. Both were in-tank sealed pumps, and I didn't take them apart to see what exactly failed. I suppose the bearings may have failed because the seals failed, and allowed fuel into the bearings. I would think contaimination, either through a clogged intake screen or contaminants actually getting into the pump and "jamming" the impeller would be another. Jeff Andre' Raleigh, NC