Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #37670
From: Russell Duffy <rusty@radrotary.com>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Single rotor video
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:12:34 -0500
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
I wonder if having only one rotor if torque reversal between firing pulse might have more of an effect at slower rpm in loading/unloading prop blades than at higher.   
 
Hi Ed,
 
No doubt at all that slower speed is the main problem.  If I understand this all correctly, what's needed is enough inertia to carry through the compression stroke without slowing down significantly.  At higher rpms, the rotating mass has enough inertia to take care of the problem, but at lower rpms, a flywheel would be needed.  The weight of the flywheel would be determined by how low you want to go in rpm.  
 
Adding weight is sort of the brute force way to fix it, but it could also be fixed by adding enough damping to absorb the speed changes.  My understanding is that I need something really soft, and even the softest damper I can get is probably not going to work as well as I'd like it to.  With any luck though, it will be good enough to get around 2000 rpm for "idle". 
 
BTW, to make everyone feel better, my EC-2 is doing something I haven't been able to explain either.  I have to run with cold start on to have enough fuel to run, which would imply that I'm only getting half the fuel I'm supposed to get with it off.  I'm sure I've goofed something up, and I haven't really taken the time to figure it out yet, but I do have a small Holley carb on the way to test as well :-)
 
Rusty
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster