Return-Path: <crobinson@rfgonline.com>
Received: from border.rfgonline.com ([65.171.123.242] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 2633000 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 14:09:16 -0400
Received: (qmail 18981 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2003 18:13:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO EXCHANGE.rfgonline.com) (192.168.150.101)
  by 192.168.150.1 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2003 18:13:48 -0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP - Success at last?
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 14:09:15 -0400
Message-ID: <0B27ED95697C4D4CBC82D79E790FE567086F88@exchange.rfgonline.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP - Success at last?
Thread-Index: AcOQDB+dyu8umzQBQ9GXRkeWm3DpBAAFe9+w
From: "Robinson, Chad" <crobinson@rfgonline.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

> Are you telling us that you've built (or are building) an=20
> airplane and can't build a simple 2" valve?

I sure am. My airplane is all composite construction. I have no lathe, =
no mill, no drill press, no bandsaw, no riveting tools, no welding =
equipment, and the list goes on.

Did you have a point? Am I less of a man because I'd rather buy a =
proven, tested check valve than build one?

Regards,
Chad