X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.237] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 2042425 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 May 2007 17:15:14 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.184.237; envelope-from=hansconser@gmail.com Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i3so1496194wra for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 14:14:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dM0+yS4ac0a3nhouKfyeVcX8j06LbndO+Ks3hFZp/7KDfUs/lafeRZfHs9iTwXKRrBdqi2vMR5kNygSrCTiY5f3GVMP5VsbKzJXE8/6LV9nR0WB1BpHjY8C3xZglV1oc3QXpAM1L7sr/SIe1mvvzgwdOPSFpB/8HXVGEH1N7nZw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=atwC/WDbg+kVrYGnn6Ti/xLkCw0Vqpexks7+AxwwUxAnyWULdOp9jsoXo0Erjp8XewLYmHi53dHd2VZp0brCgrCgdf/wBpPiVUL2p2UU3INXXdOUXReJCAIyRw5ZEhPfiqA0Qd/oR0uh2YgZ3eJixrI11RHbYAB+8/UuYfOaISM= Received: by 10.114.56.1 with SMTP id e1mr725683waa.1179090877315; Sun, 13 May 2007 14:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.77.12 with HTTP; Sun, 13 May 2007 14:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2e24f88d0705131414vec37483i4d2e043b3d8f37dc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 15:14:37 -0600 From: "Hans Conser" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 smoke question In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: On 5/13/07, Tracy Crook wrote: > Outstanding is right. It's so outstanding that I tend to put it in the same > category as the other info he has dispensed (I.e., smoke). I could be > wrong though. All things being equal, the P Port motor should make more > power than the sideport engine. Just not sure it is THAT much more. Everet > Hatch was able to make a little over 210 HP at 6000 with carefully tuned > long p-port runners after much R&D. I do believe those numbers. > > > Tracy Wasn't Hatch using small peripheral ports? I think Paul's dyno engine was with the big Leman style ports. Hans