Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.203.23.149; envelope-from=rjechtinaw@toast.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <list-2038970@logan.com>
References: <list-2038970@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <4DBD3599-090E-44F2-9283-F9C079C0CB9E@toast.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: randy echtinaw <rjechtinaw@toast.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Operating limitations question- not rotary related
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 08:12:05 -0400
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Rusty, please post the final answer
Thanks,
Randy

On May 11, 2007, at 9:56 PM, Russell Duffy wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> Sorry for the off topic question, but I'm trying to figure out if =20
> my DAR is screwing up the operating limitations that he's been =20
> issuing.
>
> If you received an airworthiness certificate in the last year or =20
> so, would you look and see if you have one, or both of these items:
>
> (17) The pilot in command of this aircraft must hold an appropriate =20=

> category/class rating. If required, the pilot in command also must =20
> hold a type rating in accordance with part 61, or a letter of =20
> authorization issued by an FAA Flight Standards Operations Inspector.
> (18) The pilot in command of this aircraft must hold a pilot =20
> certificate or an authorized instructor=92s logbook endorsement. The =20=

> pilot in command also must meet the requirements of =A7 61.31(e), =20
> (f), (g), (h), (i), and (j), as appropriate.
>
> My DAR has been including both, but from what another DAR said, the =20=

> first applies to turbojet and turbofan aircraft over 12,500 lbs, =20
> and item 18 applies to most exp aircraft.  If that's true, you =20
> should only  have one or the other.  Item 17 is what's causing me =20
> to get a SP category/class rating for my gyroplane, but now I find =20
> out that it isn't supposed to be there.
>
> Please just reply to me directly, rather than cluttering up the =20
> list with replies.
>
> Thanks,
> Rusty (getting back to the single rotor soon)
> Rusty (at) radrotary.com
>
>
>