X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 30 [X] Return-Path: Received: from [66.219.56.248] (HELO qnsi-xch.qnsi.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 2035893 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:36:42 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.219.56.248; envelope-from=bhughes@qnsi.net Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Return-Receipt-To: "Bobby J. Hughes" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] EC2 question Disposition-Notification-To: "Bobby J. Hughes" Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 08:37:42 -0600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] EC2 question Thread-Index: AceSriJD++/SwcDSSQWStWPCgiROPAAYi6vA From: "Bobby J. Hughes" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Ben, I am not using the EM2 but have wired for it. I am also using the GRT EIS. I plan to borrow Dennis H.'s one night when he's asleep and run the auto tune. Maybe we could convince Tracy to make a rental EM2 available to assist with tuning.=20 Bobby=20 -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ben Schneider Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 7:49 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] EC2 question Gang, I sent Tracy an email regarding using both his EM2 and my GRT EIS. The reason I want to use both is, I have a GRT EFIS and want to display the engine parameters on the EFIS and utilize its user definable limits. I also want EM2's auto tune capability. Tracy answered my question very well, but I hate to bother him again, as I know he has a million things going on, as well as trying to get ready to be gone for a while. So let me pose this question to you all. He says the pressure functions will not be able to be shared. But temperatures would. What parameters does the EM2 use to auto tune? Meaning, what are the neccessary measurements for it to do its job, and what are just on there for pilot information. I was thinking, that if there are parameters that have to be shared, I could put in switches to switch from one monitor to the other. Most of the time utilizing the GRT EIS, but for tuning and engine set up or changes, switch to the EM2. Thoughts? Am I just crazy? Is the auto tune that difficult manually that it is worth all this trouble? Thanks... Ben Schneider -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html