Ben;
I think the right
answer is to use the EM2; and to get Tracy to give
us the info needed (data format, baud rate, which leads, etc) to feed a
converter that allows displaying the data on the GRT screen. I can get
the converter made if I can get the needed input. I have raised the issue
with Tracy but haven’t pressed – maybe if we both do. Tracy? (Pressure,
pressure). It’s not urgent; I don’t think it is that tough;
but I’m just guessing.
Al
I sent Tracy an email regarding using both his EM2 and my GRT
EIS. The
reason
I want to use both is, I have a GRT EFIS and want to display the
engine
parameters on the EFIS and utilize its user definable limits. I
also
want EM2's auto tune capability. Tracy answered my question very
well,
but I hate to bother him again, as I know he has a million things
going
on, as well as trying to get ready to be gone for a while. So let me
pose
this question to you all. He says the pressure functions will not be
able
to be shared. But temperatures would. What parameters does the EM2
use
to auto tune? Meaning, what are the neccessary measurements for it to
do
its job, and what are just on there for pilot information. I was
thinking,
that if there are parameters that have to be shared, I could put
in
switches to switch from one monitor to the other. Most of the time
utilizing
the GRT EIS, but for tuning and engine set up or changes, switch
to
the EM2. Thoughts? Am I just crazy? Is the auto tune that difficult
manually
that it is worth all this trouble?
Thanks...
Ben
Schneider
--
Homepage:
http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive
and UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html