Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:39:56 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from cpimssmtpu09.email.msn.com ([207.46.181.84] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0) with ESMTP id 1842179 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:31:22 -0400 Received: from bhickman ([67.243.12.17]) by cpimssmtpu09.email.msn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905); Tue, 22 Oct 2002 06:30:00 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <004e01c279d0$7b5dd2a0$284ffea9@suwanneevalley.net> Reply-To: "Tracy Crook" From: "Tracy Crook" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP Tech Data Take 1,000,002 X-Original-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:39:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Original-Return-Path: lors01@msn.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2002 13:30:01.0446 (UTC) FILETIME=[1F8F2060:01C279CF] > Al Gietzen wrote: > > > > > From what little data I was able to find for the water pump on the > > 20B, it will pump about 35 gpm at engine RPM of 6000. Marginal, at > > best, for that climbout on a 90 degree day. At altitude, at cruise; > > the EWP may be able to handle it. > > > > Gentlemen: as a data point I have in front of me the factory service > manual for the 1985 RX-7. The Technical Data section lists the water > pump capacity as 150-160 liters per minute/39.6-42.3 U.S. gpm/33.0-35.2 > Imp. gpm at 6500 rpm of engine. They list a 1:1.18 eshaft/pump pulley > ratio. Given that these numbers are for both the NA 12A and 13B models > I'd definitely check to see if maybe that 20B might require a tad more > flow especially running at 6K rpm at a relatively high power setting. > > -Mike Robert Thanks for the factory data Mike. FWIW, I noticed that the later model 13B turbo & 20B pump impellers are slightly larger in diameter (about 1/8" or so) than the 84 - 88 pumps I had laying around. Could make a difference in GPM capability. Tracy