X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 73 [XX] (40%) URL: contains host with port number (40%) BODY: contains "rx" (20%) HEADERS: mail has MS Outlook properties but missing "Outlook" in "X-Mailer" Headers Return-Path: Received: from bay0-omc1-s33.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.105] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with ESMTP id 1939623 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:01:07 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.246.105; envelope-from=lors01@msn.com Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.250.79]) by bay0-omc1-s33.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:58:48 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:58:48 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 4.171.150.121 by BAY115-DAV7.phx.gbl with DAV; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:58:47 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [4.171.150.121] X-Originating-Email: [lors01@msn.com] X-Sender: lors01@msn.com From: "Tracy Crook" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel grade for renessis Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:58:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004E_01C76D6C.83D7EC10" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MSN 9 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.50.0034.2000 Seal-Send-Time: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:58:43 -0400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Mar 2007 20:58:48.0022 (UTC) FILETIME=[0D5B4F60:01C76D8E] Return-Path: lors01@msn.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01C76D6C.83D7EC10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mazda says premium 91 oct. I use 87 oct in the airplane and only = *think* I detected detonation once during some advanced ignition timing = tests. Most RX-8 drivers who have tried both always seem to say that = both performance and fuel economy are better on 87. Go figure. There = are some legitimate reasons why this could be true. Tracy (Whoo Hooo!...... Bluemountain shipped on Thursday!) ----- Original Message -----=20 From: jewen@comporium.net=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 2:38 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel grade for renessis Dennis, Iwas building a Renesis before I found and changed to a 20B. Due to = the 10:0 compression, I was planning on super or 100LL to avoid possible detonation. If memory serves me, this was also Bruce T's = recomendation. Joe On Fri, March 23, 2007 2:13 pm, Dennis Haverlah wrote: > What grade - regular, preminum or super - would be the recommended = auto > fuel for the RX-8 Renessis engine with RD 1C and normal intake = system? I > designed the fuel system for auto fuel and have been ground running = it on > regular fuel. > > Thanks, > Dennis H. > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01C76D6C.83D7EC10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mazda says premium 91 oct.  I use 87 oct in the = airplane and=20 only *think* I detected detonation once during some advanced = ignition=20 timing tests.   Most RX-8 drivers who have tried both always = seem to=20 say that both performance and fuel economy are better on 87.  = Go=20 figure.  There are some legitimate  reasons why this = could be=20 true.
 
Tracy  (Whoo Hooo!......  Bluemountain shipped on=20 Thursday!)
----- Original Message -----
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 = 2:38=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel = grade for=20 renessis

Dennis,
Iwas building a Renesis before I found and = changed=20 to a 20B.  Due to the
10:0 compression, I was planning on = super or=20 100LL to avoid possible
detonation.  If memory serves me, this = was=20 also Bruce T's recomendation.
Joe



On Fri, March 23, = 2007=20 2:13 pm, Dennis Haverlah wrote:
> What grade - regular, preminum = or=20 super - would be the recommended auto
> fuel for the RX-8 = Renessis=20 engine with RD 1C and normal intake system? I
> designed the = fuel system=20 for auto fuel and have been ground running it on
> regular=20 fuel.
>
> Thanks,
> Dennis = H.
>
>
>=20 --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> = Archive=20 and UnSub:
> http:= //mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>
>=



--
Homepage: =20 http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archi= ve and=20 UnSub:   http:= //mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
------=_NextPart_000_004E_01C76D6C.83D7EC10--