Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.192.84; envelope-from=rlwhite@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:34:40 -0600
From: Bob White <rlwhite@comcast.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: American Rotary Engine vs. RWS Reduction Drive
Message-Id: <20070321173440.445a1b43.rlwhite@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-1935653@logan.com>
References: <list-1935653@logan.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

There is an offset on the Powersport unit which would lower the
engine.  I guess in your case Ed, it would move it off to the side a
little. :)  I would like to have had that feature as I could have left
the alternator at the stock location.  It wasn't worth twice the money
though.

Bob W.


On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:20:26 -0400
"Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com> wrote:

> MessageHi David,
> 
> The bottom line is you can spend considerably more money, gain 20 lbs right up on the nose (tail in you case, where you probably do not want it) , not have the cheapness of standard Ford transmission parts to lower any repair (unlikely) cost  and still not end up with any difference that the aircraft  will notice. (other than the lighter weight of the RWS PSRU). 
> 
> Now, I personally believe the Powersport looks very nice and it appears to be a well engineered piece of gear box.  But, while it will make your engine installation heavier, it will make your pocket book lighter (but the one won't offset the other {:>).
> 
>  From my viewpoint, I can get both an good rebuilt engine AND a RWS PSRU for less money .  But, this all just my personal opinion.
> 
> Ed
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Tracy Crook 
>   To: Rotary motors in aircraft 
>   Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 6:34 PM
>   Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: American Rotary Engine vs. RWS Reduction Drive
> 
> 
>   Hi David,
>   Didn't recognize the name of that company but after going to the website I see it is just another name used by Atkins Rotary.  The redrive is a nice one (same one developed by Powersport) but about 20 pounds heavier and more than twice the cost of RWS. Last time I checked it was $6500.00.  
> 
>   Tracy Crook,   RWS
>     ----- Original Message ----- 
>     From: David Moyer 
>     To: Rotary motors in aircraft 
>     Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 5:28 PM
>     Subject: [FlyRotary] American Rotary Engine vs. RWS Reduction Drive
> 
> 
>     Any comments why I would want to pay double for American Rotary Engine's over RWS for a 13B turbo? This is going to be an installation that I am putting into my Cozy MK-IV playing off what John Slade has done in his Cozy.
> 
>     David Moyer
>     Cozy Mark-IV My garage is getting tight, close to needing to put it in a hanger. Planning panel and engine setup.


-- 
N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 - http://www.bob-white.com
First Flight:  11/23/2006 7:50AM - 3.8 Hours Total Time
Cables for your rotary installation - http://www.roblinphoto.com/shop/