X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 10 [X] Return-Path: Received: from bay0-omc2-s41.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.177] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with ESMTP id 1935576 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:35:19 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.246.177; envelope-from=lors01@msn.com Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.250.91]) by bay0-omc2-s41.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:34:34 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:34:33 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 4.171.114.248 by BAY115-DAV19.phx.gbl with DAV; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:34:29 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [4.171.114.248] X-Originating-Email: [lors01@msn.com] X-Sender: lors01@msn.com From: "Tracy Crook" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] American Rotary Engine vs. RWS Reduction Drive Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:34:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C76BE7.8E1337B0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MSN 9 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.50.0034.2000 Seal-Send-Time: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:34:26 -0400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Mar 2007 22:34:33.0727 (UTC) FILETIME=[193CD0F0:01C76C09] Return-Path: lors01@msn.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C76BE7.8E1337B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MessageHi David, Didn't recognize the name of that company but after going to the website = I see it is just another name used by Atkins Rotary. The redrive is a = nice one (same one developed by Powersport) but about 20 pounds heavier = and more than twice the cost of RWS. Last time I checked it was = $6500.00. =20 Tracy Crook, RWS ----- Original Message -----=20 From: David Moyer=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 5:28 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] American Rotary Engine vs. RWS Reduction Drive Any comments why I would want to pay double for American Rotary = Engine's over RWS for a 13B turbo? This is going to be an installation = that I am putting into my Cozy MK-IV playing off what John Slade has = done in his Cozy. David Moyer Cozy Mark-IV My garage is getting tight, close to needing to put it in = a hanger. Planning panel and engine setup. ------=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C76BE7.8E1337B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Hi David,
Didn't recognize the name of that company but after going to the = website I=20 see it is just another name used by Atkins Rotary.  The redrive is = a nice=20 one (same one developed by Powersport) but about 20 pounds heavier = and more=20 than twice the cost of RWS. Last time I checked it = was $6500.00. =20
 
Tracy Crook,   RWS
----- Original Message -----
From: David=20 Moyer
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 = 5:28=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] American = Rotary=20 Engine vs. RWS Reduction Drive

Any = comments why I=20 would want to pay double for American Rotary Engine's over RWS for a = 13B=20 turbo? This is going to be an installation that I am putting into my = Cozy=20 MK-IV playing off what John Slade has done in his = Cozy.
 
David=20 Moyer
Cozy = Mark-IV My=20 garage is getting tight, close to needing to put it in a hanger. = Planning=20 panel and engine = setup.
------=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C76BE7.8E1337B0--