|
|
Lynn,
got any links to look at the "Stinson"
Thomas
On 3/6/07, Lehanover@aol.com <Lehanover@aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 3/6/2007 5:21:03 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
wrjjrs@aol.com writes:
Thomas,
You at least understand the problem. The desire for low-or-no rebound is
at odds with the strength issue. If you articulate the gear you can
improve it, but it gets expensive quick.
Bill
That is the advantage of the rising rate rocker and the shock. No jounce
resistance but lots of rebound damping.
Lynn E. Hanover
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at
AOL.com.
|
|