X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.247] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with ESMTP id 1905796 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:22:34 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.132.247; envelope-from=rotary.thjakits@gmail.com Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c34so1726808anc for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:21:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=IYk67bja6JB2vGm9LvjEYKWTIZWgcQBbpAk84LxC3/wdEIsjkZSxFklhxTWClQbF0hydYyuWB2Fmeeh5mBcqfSKT0brhwFj2Xc9U9eBTu0b7nDbe5kTEFw5O4EDA1NS23sS0GLf1okYnvV/W6kZgtcZXkzNZZNgZzkmdrFzYHlE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=GQqI6I8oRv1Q1T/jN1L2Jro9nM7FzRLYhxydnaigb2mwpjDxNwZfTS+PbWjVJ09yfJayeWWAHbRZBi/7YOkMlUAZCk+Q2KSJd2glOQ/Qy1ax9TJioMZTk5YnLGoJYAQ8jANMlFa2NWesNH/CRpaP1WItqQzx64w4kKTw/QiFEw8= Received: by 10.100.173.19 with SMTP id v19mr4704345ane.1173223307108; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:21:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.195.12 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:21:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <63163d560703061521y45403f7fj36b7158f0e124f24@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:21:47 -0500 From: "Thomas Jakits" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine choise for BD-4 (changed from "Hard Landing ") In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_88182_25820298.1173223307052" References: ------=_Part_88182_25820298.1173223307052 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Lynn, got any links to look at the "Stinson" Thomas On 3/6/07, Lehanover@aol.com wrote: > > In a message dated 3/6/2007 5:21:03 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > wrjjrs@aol.com writes: > > Thomas, > You at least understand the problem. The desire for low-or-no rebound is > at odds with the strength issue. If you articulate the gear you can improve > it, but it gets expensive quick. > Bill > > That is the advantage of the rising rate rocker and the shock. No jounce > resistance but lots of rebound damping. > > > Lynn E. Hanover > > > > ------------------------------ > AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free > from AOL at *AOL.com*. > > ------=_Part_88182_25820298.1173223307052 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Lynn,

got any links to look at the "Stinson"

Thomas

On 3/6/07, Lehanover@aol.com <Lehanover@aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 3/6/2007 5:21:03 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, wrjjrs@aol.com writes:
Thomas,
You at least understand the problem. The desire for low-or-no rebound is at odds with the strength issue. If you articulate the gear you can improve it, but it gets expensive quick.
Bill
That is the advantage of the rising rate rocker and the shock. No jounce resistance but lots of rebound damping.
 
 
Lynn E. Hanover




AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.

------=_Part_88182_25820298.1173223307052--