X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from imo-m23.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.4] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with ESMTP id 1905703 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:20:20 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.4; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-m23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.bdc.c90d879 (52317) for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:19:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from mblk-r26 (mblk-r26.mblk.aol.com [152.163.179.16]) by ciaaol-d01.mail.aol.com (v114_r3.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIAAOLD017-cc5d45ede8eb388; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:19:23 -0500 References: To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine choise for BD-4 (changed from "Hard Landing ") Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:19:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: wrjjrs@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8C92E54A07D021F_1150_1CE3_mblk-r26.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL WebMail 24019 Received: from 65.161.241.3 by mblk-r26.sysops.aol.com (152.163.179.16) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:19:22 -0500 Message-Id: <8C92E54A07F6475-1150-F5F@mblk-r26.sysops.aol.com> X-AOL-IP: 152.163.179.16 X-Spam-Flag: NO ----------MB_8C92E54A07D021F_1150_1CE3_mblk-r26.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Thomas, You at least understand the problem. The desire for low-or-no rebound is at odds with the strength issue. If you articulate the gear you can improve it, but it gets expensive quick. Bill -----Original Message----- From: rotary.thjakits@gmail.com To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Sent: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 1:45 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine choise for BD-4 (changed from "Hard Landing ") I thought so.. The idea is to keep the speed, but make the BD-4 more rough field capable, shock absorbing without too much rebound would be the ideal thing: Like the air-bumps on Baja-Racers.... Thomas On 3/6/07, wrjjrs@aol.com wrote: Thomas, The biggest problem there is, "Does not or barely rebound". The different weights is also tough, but with carbon you could design strong enough for a 4 seater but it would be a bit stiff when unloaded. Bill Jepson -----Original Message----- From: rotary.thjakits@gmail.com To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Sent: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:18 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine choise for BD-4 (changed from "Hard Landing ") I think in one of the old newsletters there was talk about fibreglass landing gear... Anyone out there with the know how to "tune" the gear to specific properties? I like Lynn's idea of using something "designed" like the Stinson gear (need to look that up, any links...?). Already thought about "Airbag"-suspension, a la Hornet (Challenger-derivative...) At the end the best designed gear does not need any adjusting.. Who has the expertise to make/design a glass/carbon gear, that: Absorbs shock does it progressively Does not or barely rebound Can accommodate different weights (4 seater) I understand one can play with different fibers, orientation, different resins, etc. But where to start?? :)) Thomas On 3/6/07, Bob White wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:24:35 EST Lehanover@aol.com wrote: > > I don't remember the Whitman geared BD-4. I was thinking about a Cessna main > gear, but I found a complete assembly at Sun&Fun and I could not pick it up. > So, I forgot about it. > Lynn E. Hanover >


**************************************
AOL now offers free > email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at > http://www.aol.com. > I just tested the durability of the BD style gear made from 7075 aluminum. After ripping them completely off the landing gear box, they are in perfect condition. Bob W. (Leaving to do more paperwork with the FAA.) -- N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 - http://www.bob-white.com First Flight: 11/23/2006 7:50AM - 3.8 Hours Total Time Cables for your rotary installation - http://www.roblinphoto.com/shop/ -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. ----------MB_8C92E54A07D021F_1150_1CE3_mblk-r26.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Thomas,
You at least understand the problem. The desire for low-or-no rebound is at odds with the strength issue. If you articulate the gear you can improve it, but it gets expensive quick.
Bill
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: rotary.thjakits@gmail.com
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
Sent: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 1:45 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine choise for BD-4 (changed from "Hard Landing ")

I thought so..

The idea is to keep the speed, but make the BD-4 more rough field capable, shock absorbing without too much rebound would be the ideal thing:
Like the air-bumps on Baja-Racers....

Thomas

On 3/6/07, wrjjrs@aol.com <wrjjrs@aol.com> wrote:
Thomas, The biggest problem there is, "Does not or barely rebound". The different weights is also tough, but with carbon you could design strong enough for a 4 seater but it would be a bit stiff when unloaded.
Bill Jepson
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: rotary.thjakits@gmail.com
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
Sent: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:18 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine choise for BD-4 (changed from "Hard Landing ")

I think in one of the old newsletters there was talk about fibreglass landing gear...
Anyone out there with the know how  to "tune" the gear to specific properties?
I like Lynn's idea of using something "designed" like the Stinson gear (need to look that up, any links...?).
Already thought about  "Airbag"-suspension, a la Hornet (Challenger-derivative...)

At the end the best designed gear does not need any adjusting..
Who has the expertise to make/design a glass/carbon gear, that:

Absorbs shock
does it progressively
Does not or barely rebound
Can accommodate different weights (4 seater)

I understand one can play with different fibers, orientation, different resins, etc.
But where to start?? :))

Thomas



On 3/6/07, Bob White <rlwhite@comcast.net > wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:24:35 EST
Lehanover@aol.com wrote:

<snip>
>
> I don't remember the Whitman geared BD-4. I was thinking about a Cessna  main
> gear, but I found a complete assembly at Sun&Fun and I could not pick  it up.
> So, I forgot about it.
<snip>
> Lynn E. Hanover
> <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free
> email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at
> http://www.aol.com.
>
I just tested the durability of the BD style gear made from 7075
aluminum.  After ripping them completely off the landing gear box, they
are in perfect condition.

Bob W.  (Leaving to do more paperwork with the FAA.)

--
N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 - http://www.bob-white.com
First Flight:  11/23/2006 7:50AM - 3.8 Hours Total Time
Cables for your rotary installation - http://www.roblinphoto.com/shop/

--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html


AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.


AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.
----------MB_8C92E54A07D021F_1150_1CE3_mblk-r26.sysops.aol.com--