Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.190.48.232; envelope-from=mooneydryver@yahoo.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;
  b=UDHt2/KIiyAGJxh83IqMb4gLlBXFMKoxpVO0ky+nx1w8QE32BcK71p5lhklmMPchQGPRvZNPncdPbZPkumuZyVeCUQhhFDPuLCU29O05H3yBaz9ebwj0dsKmOoObSAGMcujUhe6UI/7PcM0egMZHItS8nQSZ6UwNQHLe5g82IN4=;
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:38:22 -0800 (PST)
From: John Overman <mooneydryver@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Last Screen Display Photos
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-1861729@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <844378.38169.qm@web52709.mail.yahoo.com>

Ed just a thought;
   I think a lot of new builders are using very few
round gages. I, for ond, don't have one round thing in
my panel.
                               John


--- Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com> wrote:

> You have a good point. Dave.
> 
> I wanted to occupy the smallest amount of instrument
> space consistent with a readable display.  Until the
> new OLED type display became available, I just was
> not happy about the quality.  The old one was
> readable under most lighten and viewing conditions
> but not all.  This one is much, much better.
> 
> At the moment, I had planned to package it for the 2
> 1/4" dia standard instrument hole.  The trouble is I
> have found no source of reasonably priced instrument
> cases.  I did find a few metal ones with minor flaws
> and even those were $25 apiece on sale.
>