Thanks Ed, the website is in the works. I'm not a webdesigner so I've out-sourced it and that can take time to get it 'right'. Because of the actual machine dimensions, machining Titanium is out of the question, anything under a mild steel is possible however. I'll know more after testing and commisioning of the complete unit. [These types of things are a bit un-known as a machine of this size is built to order, its not something you just 'go down and buy'] Getting it set up and installed has been an experiance.
Jarrett [I can't wait to get'er running, thats for sure!]
----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Date: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 4:55 pm
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New Cowl Contest
> Good Grief, Jarrett, that is a monstrous piece of machinery (even > a smaller version). Looks like you could carve your own SR-71 out > of a single piece of titanium. Impressive. Looking forward to > your website. > > Ed > ----- Original Message ----- > From: H & J Johnson > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 5:09 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New Cowl Contest > > > > George, its a Gantry Mill, the parts sit almost right on the > floor and the gantry runs on two long side rails which are bolted > into the floor. Attached is a picture showing a similar type of > machine. This particular unit is from Scaled in So-cal. Mine is > smaller than this unit, but then I didn't have the budget that > they do :-) >
> I'll have pictures/vid's up on my website, which should be in > about a month. > > Jarrett > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: George Lendich <lendich@optusnet.com.au> > > Date: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 3:58 pm > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New Cowl Contest > > > > > > Jarrett, > > What sort of CNC is that ? > > George ( down under) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dave, > > > > I'd vote for the smiley, I would still wonder if having the > > opening out off the bottom face of the cowl wouldn't be > better.
> > Mind you, two other things come into play. There probably > isn't to > > much [more] turbulent air or thicker boundry layer that close > > behind the prop at that location. No more than the turbulance > > farther out. Secondly, the rotational vector up close to the > cowl > > very well could be less than farther out.[ to exagerate the > issue, > > imagine the rotational vector out near the prop tip's.] > > > > I've designed a few cowls over the last couple years. > Attached > > are a couple pictures to illustrate. Since you plan to use a > lower > > and upper ducting, I've attached drawings/pic's showing how > I've > > done both designs. It would be a simple matter to combine the > two,
> > to arrive at your desired design. > > > > Also I've not said much in the past, but my CNC mill has been > > installed and is just awaiting final wire-up and commisioning. > I > > plan to start offering its use to the Rotary crowd in > producing > > components like cowls, proper diffusion ducting, spinners > [which > > properly fair into the cowls] etc. Theres many other > components > > I'd like to get into building but plan to start out with these > few > > and expand from there. The mill is currently capable of > milling > > parts up to 8 x 18 x 3 [feet] and will be upgraded in the > spring > > to have a 4ft [instead of 3] Z axis. Later, we plan to expand > its
> > abilities to 5 axis, however this is more in the neighbourhood > of > > a year or so. > > > > I'll have a website up in the next month or so. However the > > meantime, if I can be of help, please let me know. > > > > > > > > Jarrett Johnson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: David Leonard <wdleonard@gmail.com> > > > > Date: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:22 pm > > > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New Cowl Contest > > > >
> > > Todd, if it aint broke dont fix it!!!! > > > > > > You are right about the boundry layer. But you can make up > > for > > > that with a > > > little extra size or maybe moving closer to the prop (eg P- > > 40). > > > > > > Also, Doug dempsy has been telling me how Chuck Dunlap had > a > > real > > > problemwith a duct that was away from the boundry layer, > but > > fixed > > > his issue when > > > he make it bigger and more like the smile. > > > > > > The smile votes seem to have it so far... > > > > > > Dave Leonard
> > > > > > > > > On 1/30/07, Todd Bartrim <bartrim@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > I was thinking that the "oh cowl" would be better at > > excluding the > > > > boundary layer, which would be better for cooling. This > is > > just > > > based on > > > > comments I've read on the list during previous ducting > > > discussions. Based on > > > > this info, I felt my oil cooler duct was less than > optimal > > (even > > > though> temps are good), so I figured I could reduce the > size > > of > > > my inlet if I
> > > > eliminated the boundary air layer. As your "smile" duct > is > > > similar (see > > > > attached pic) I figured this would be applicable. I hope > I'm > > > wrong and you > > > > prove it before I change my cowl. > > > > > > > > Todd (building Electric Bob's Audio Isolator Amplifier > > today) > > > > > > > > On 1/30/07, Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > David Leonard wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I call them the "Oh Cowl" and the "Smiley Cowl..."his > > > > >
> > > > > Go with the smile, but put a raised ledge on the cowl > side > > > just behind > > > > > the spinner to accelerate the air and thin the boundary > > layer. > > > Reduces > > > > > the ingestion of turbulent air. Check the CAFE > > Foundation's drag > > > > > reduction report. They have a picture of what it looks > > like > > > on a > > > > > production aircraft. I have a link to it at home, but > not > > here. > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > ,|"|"|, Ernest Christley | > > > > > ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta Builder | > > > > > o| d |o http://ernest.isa-geek.org | > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > > > > Archive and UnSub: > > > http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > -- > > > > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > > > Archive and UnSub: > > http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > David Leonard > > > > > > Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY > > > My websites at: > > > http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html > > > http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/vp4skydoc/index.html > > > http://leonardiniraq.blogspot.com > > > > > > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > > ----------- > > > > > > -- > > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ >
|