Jarrett,
Gawd that's massive, even something smaller would
be awesome. It would be good, seeing your involved with Aviation, to get a lot
of work involving Aviation products.
Would your machine be able to handle a light
fuselage pattern, say about 20' long, usual 2 person width, say
44"?
George (down under)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 8:09
AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New Cowl
Contest
George, its a Gantry Mill, the parts sit almost right on the floor and
the gantry runs on two long side rails which are bolted into the floor.
Attached is a picture showing a similar type of machine. This particular unit
is from Scaled in So-cal. Mine is smaller than this unit, but then I didn't
have the budget that they do :-)
I'll have pictures/vid's up on my website, which should be in about
a month.
Jarrett
----- Original Message -----
From: George Lendich <lendich@optusnet.com.au>
Date: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 3:58 pm
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New Cowl Contest
> > Jarrett, > What sort of CNC is
that ? > George ( down under) > > > >
> > > Dave, > > I'd vote for
the smiley, I would still wonder if having the > opening out off the
bottom face of the cowl wouldn't be better. > Mind you, two other
things come into play. There probably isn't to > much [more] turbulent
air or thicker boundry layer that close > behind the prop at that
location. No more than the turbulance > farther out. Secondly, the
rotational vector up close to the cowl > very well could be less than
farther out.[ to exagerate the issue, > imagine the rotational vector
out near the prop tip's.] > > I've designed a few
cowls over the last couple years. Attached > are a couple
pictures to illustrate. Since you plan to use a lower > and upper
ducting, I've attached drawings/pic's showing how I've > done both
designs. It would be a simple matter to combine the two, > to arrive at
your desired design. > > Also I've not said much in the
past, but my CNC mill has been > installed and is just awaiting final
wire-up and commisioning. I > plan to start offering its use to the
Rotary crowd in producing > components like cowls, proper diffusion
ducting, spinners [which > properly fair into the cowls] etc. Theres
many other components > I'd like to get into building but plan to start
out with these few > and expand from there. The mill is currently
capable of milling > parts up to 8 x 18 x 3 [feet] and will be upgraded
in the spring > to have a 4ft [instead of 3] Z axis. Later, we plan to
expand its > abilities to 5 axis, however this is more in the
neighbourhood of > a year or so. > > I'll have a
website up in the next month or so. However the > meantime, if I can be
of help, please let me know. > > > > Jarrett
Johnson > > > > > > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- >
> > From: David Leonard <wdleonard@gmail.com>
> > Date: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:22 pm >
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New Cowl Contest > >
> > Todd, if it aint broke dont fix it!!!! > >
> > You are right about the boundry layer. But you can
make up > for > > that with a > >
little extra size or maybe moving closer to the prop (eg P- > 40).
> > > > Also, Doug dempsy has been telling me
how Chuck Dunlap had a > real > > problemwith a duct
that was away from the boundry layer, but > fixed > >
his issue when > > he make it bigger and more like the smile.
> > > > The smile votes seem to have it so
far... > > > > Dave Leonard >
> > > > > On 1/30/07, Todd Bartrim
<bartrim@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >
> I was thinking that the "oh cowl" would be better at > excluding
the > > > boundary layer, which would be better for
cooling. This is > just > > based on >
> > comments I've read on the list during previous ducting
> > discussions. Based on > > > this info,
I felt my oil cooler duct was less than optimal > (even >
> though> temps are good), so I figured I could reduce the size >
of > > my inlet if I > > > eliminated the
boundary air layer. As your "smile" duct is > > similar (see
> > > attached pic) I figured this would be applicable. I
hope I'm > > wrong and you > > > prove it
before I change my cowl. > > > > > >
Todd (building Electric Bob's Audio Isolator Amplifier
> today) > > > > > > On 1/30/07,
Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com > wrote: > > >
> > > > > David Leonard wrote: > >
> > > > > > > I call them the "Oh Cowl" and the
"Smiley Cowl..."his > > > > > > >
> Go with the smile, but put a raised ledge on the cowl side >
> just behind > > > > the spinner to accelerate the
air and thin the boundary > layer. > > Reduces
> > > > the ingestion of turbulent air. Check the
CAFE > Foundation's drag > > > > reduction
report. They have a picture of what it looks > like
> > on a > > > > production
aircraft. I have a link to it at home, but not > here.
> > > > > > > > -- >
> > >
,|"|"|,
Ernest Christley | > >
> > ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta
Builder | > > >
> o| d
|o http://ernest.isa-geek.org
| > > > > > > > > --
> > > > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> > > > Archive and UnSub: >
> http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/> > >
> > > > > > > > -- >
> > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > >
Archive and UnSub: >
http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > -- >
> David Leonard > > > > Turbo Rotary RV-6
N4VY > > My websites at: > >
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html > >
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/vp4skydoc/index.html > >
http://leonardiniraq.blogspot.com > > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------- > > > -- >
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and
UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ >
-- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and
UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
|