X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Received: from imo-d23.mx.aol.com ([205.188.139.137] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.5) with ESMTP id 1798587 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:39:39 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.139.137; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-d23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.be6.e35e01d (42809) for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:38:41 -0500 (EST) From: WRJJRS@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:38:39 EST Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] New Cowl Contest To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1170135519" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5037 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1170135519 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 1/29/2007 9:19:23 PM Pacific Standard Time, wdleonard@gmail.com writes: It's time to make some space under the engine for the new larger radiator and build the inlet. So I have made a couple mock-ups of potential designs that will allow for the new radiator. I can't decide which I like better (or worse as the case may be), and am looking for input. Actually, I will just pick the one that more of you vote for, so that there will be less of you out there who are allowed to make fun of the finished product.... I call them the "Oh Cowl" and the "Smiley Cowl..." Opinions? -- David Leonard David, I prefer the "Smiley" cowl, but why keep the "standard" inlet holes too? If you need them for other items chances are you can reduce the size dramatically. Bill Jepson -------------------------------1170135519 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 1/29/2007 9:19:23 PM Pacific Standard Time,=20 wdleonard@gmail.com writes:

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>

It's time to make some space under the engine for the new larger radi= ator=20 and build the inlet.

So I have made a couple mock-ups of potential designs that will allow= for=20 the new radiator.

I can't decide which I like better (or worse as the case may be), and= am=20 looking for input. Actually, I will just pick the one that more of y= ou=20 vote for, so that there will be less of you out there who are allowed to m= ake=20 fun of the finished product....

I call them the "Oh Cowl" and the "Smiley Cowl..."

Opinions?

--
David=20 Leonard

David,

I prefer the "Smiley" cowl, but why keep the "standard" inlet hol= es=20 too? If you need them for other items chances are you can reduce the size=20 dramatically.

Bill Jepson

-------------------------------1170135519--