X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 50 [XX] (29%) SPAMTRICK: obfuscated phone number (29%) SPAMTRICK: obfuscated phone number (29%) SPAMTRICK: obfuscated phone number (14%) BODY: text/html email has no html tag Return-Path: Received: from web81004.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.199.84] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.5) with SMTP id 1782814 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:33:53 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.199.84; envelope-from=deltaflyer@prodigy.net Received: (qmail 26881 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Jan 2007 15:33:06 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=prodigy.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=wL3XA2s5X4uwPkmumdTR0PYv1+ClG9wu8ktfJFv6AXIeaSC5YayfRoiP7TXm9pJgTps42PFLoZ5lweREOBQv+m0iJs0b5yjwHt13GU/YkxjTDo30Bfe/v1sFUvinkYLULMnOrAckHp4QnmTLUNNJn8hyVdJ2OsLni6c8r2NWbYo=; X-YMail-OSG: PBZPuTYVM1l4XiZR9llmSJbVPpgfH88uwjnjIaVN1v3HBwKhoZcbhoJ.HhipkcgS9z.Ybak2LBYnPq0arr_TWWaBTIkMfPS8ZnVALiZD5v2KeOQ- Received: from [12.76.136.124] by web81004.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 07:33:05 PST Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 07:33:05 -0800 (PST) From: James Maher Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: alcohol in fuel To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-349668590-1169479985=:26193" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <971663.26193.qm@web81004.mail.mud.yahoo.com> --0-349668590-1169479985=:26193 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I used both the Aeropoxy and West Systems in the construction of my integral fuel tank. I can now confirm that the tank has been severely deteriorated by the use of auto fuel, mostly in the last year or two since ethanol has been added. Jim Dyke Delta N11XD Dale Rogers wrote: To put a bit of perspective on this, one will be hard pressed to find a laminating epoxy that is in the 100:25 range, such as Al W wrote. E-Z Poxy 100:45 by weight MGS 285/287 (and 335) 100:45 by weight Pro-Set 100:30 by weight AEROPOXY is 100:27 by weight ACSpruce's data on the West System 105/205 spec was "5:1" which suggests it is a volume measurement, but it doesn't have the Rutan Blessing, last I knew. IIRC, Perry Mick used MGS 335 and runs auto fuel in his EZ. Al Gietzen wrote: Al W wrote: After flying for six years, finally removed and disassembled my glass and foam header tank. During those six years I periodically used ethanol fuel and whatever. Always used auto fuel. No evidence of degradation of any component....soft aluminum, foam, epoxy. All looks perfect. That’s good news. Just a reminder, all epoxy that is fuel exposed must be high ratio type. Like 4 to 1. 50/50 ratio epoxies can NOT handle “fuel” over time. That’s bad news. Should I conclude from this that EZ-poxy (44-56 by weight) will NOT handle fuel with ethanol? I assume when you say “fuel” you mean fuel with ethanol, since experience has shown that EZ-poxy has handled auto fuel for periods of 15 years in some EZs. Al G -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ --0-349668590-1169479985=:26193 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I used both the Aeropoxy and West Systems in the construction of my integral fuel tank.
I can now confirm that the tank has been severely deteriorated by the use of auto fuel, mostly in the last year or two since ethanol has been added.
Jim
Dyke Delta N11XD

Dale Rogers <dale.r@cox.net> wrote:
To put a bit of perspective on this, one will be hard pressed to find a
laminating epoxy that is in the 100:25 range, such as Al W wrote.


E-Z Poxy  100:45 by weight

MGS 285/287 (and 335)  100:45 by weight

Pro-Set 100:30 by weight

AEROPOXY is 100:27 by weight

ACSpruce's data on the West System 105/205 spec was "5:1"
which suggests it is a volume measurement, but it doesn't have
the Rutan Blessing, last I knew.

IIRC, Perry Mick used MGS 335 and runs auto fuel in his EZ.


Al Gietzen wrote:
Al W wrote:
 
After flying for six years, finally removed and disassembled my glass and
foam header tank. During those six years I periodically used ethanol fuel
and whatever. Always used auto fuel.  No evidence of degradation of any
component....soft aluminum, foam, epoxy. All looks perfect.
 
That’s good news.
 
Just a reminder, all epoxy that is fuel exposed must be high ratio type.
Like 4 to 1.   50/50 ratio epoxies can NOT handle “fuel” over time.
 
That’s bad news.  Should I conclude from this that EZ-poxy (44-56 by weight) will NOT handle fuel with ethanol?  I assume when you say “fuel” you mean fuel with ethanol, since experience has shown that EZ-poxy has handled auto fuel for periods of 15 years in some EZs.
 
Al G
 

--    Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/    Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/

--0-349668590-1169479985=:26193--