X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 50 [XX] (100%) RECEIVED: Received headers not consistent with Juno "FROM:" Return-Path: Received: from m12.lax.untd.com ([64.136.30.75] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.5) with SMTP id 1780387 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 00:07:19 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.30.75; envelope-from=alwick@juno.com Received: from m12.lax.untd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by m12.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABC5F7GUAJ44CTJ for (sender ); Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:06:26 -0800 (PST) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: L941HVjjYzDhN3itp//mkMmENc/Wb4hXz3tx/QkBRlfQQGsCliOdog== Received: (from alwick@juno.com) by m12.lax.untd.com (jqueuemail) id MCK7SY5M; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:05:51 PST To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:04:56 -0800 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: alcohol in fuel Message-ID: <20070120.210507.3828.16.alwick@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 5.0.49 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 1-4,6-10,12-70,72,74-75 From: al p wick X-ContentStamp: 27:13:2352766759 X-MAIL-INFO:2deaea9e8b5fa30b1e0f579e2757eebbcbb773579a5e971a8b9a73b79a7b9af36a23ca4aea8a9e5b9ec38b6bee4b6e6b0b5fe723875abb5a379fef37bb2a07bbbeaa13ce4ba7fbf76f8f9bfb4bba23baefde8f83ba13b7cb4fcb5bea935b4f1e6b4f17a3c79baf37135e9ed307df13be974afafa9adecadab3b73a6b0ac3b7171e1e02c38beea30b275b27e7 X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 127.0.0.1|localhost|m12.lax.untd.com|alwick@juno.com I don't have a clue which epoxy I used. I ended using 3 different types over the 6 year building process. Two became obsolete. 2 gallon header was just above the main landing gear. Lots of evidence there is no significance to speculations about ethanol risk in tanks. FWIW. -al wick On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:46:50 -0600 "Barry Gardner" writes: > Al, > > What epoxy did you use, just for another data point? I'm using MGS > 335 but I > suspect, as you said, that high ratio type epoxys will all test the > same. > Thanks. > > Barry Gardner > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "al p wick" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:46 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] alcohol in fuel > > > > After flying for six years, finally removed and disassembled my > glass and > > foam header tank. During those six years I periodically used > ethanol fuel > > and whatever. Always used auto fuel. No evidence of degradation > of any > > component....soft aluminum, foam, epoxy. All looks perfect. > > > > I'm going to replace glass tank with aluminum so I can mount two > wet > > pumps inside. Wet pumps the only way to go for safety advantage. > > > > Just a reminder, all epoxy that is fuel exposed must be high ratio > type. > > Like 4 to 1. 50/50 ratio epoxies can NOT handle fuel over time. > > > > > > -al wick > > Cozy IV powered by Turbo Subaru 3.0R with variable valve lift and > cam > > timing. > > Artificial intelligence in cockpit, N9032U 240+ hours from > Portland, > > Oregon > > Glass panel design, Subaru install, Prop construct, Risk > assessment info: > > http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html > > > > -- > > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > -al wick Cozy IV powered by Turbo Subaru 3.0R with variable valve lift and cam timing. Artificial intelligence in cockpit, N9032U 240+ hours from Portland, Oregon Glass panel design, Subaru install, Prop construct, Risk assessment info: http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html