X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 30 [X] Return-Path: Received: from mail33.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.104] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4) with ESMTPS id 1722040 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:35:25 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.104; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d211-29-185-191.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.29.185.191]) by mail33.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id kBSLYSZj021311 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:34:29 +1100 Message-ID: <003901c72ac7$f74a7920$bfb91dd3@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Yet another limp home story Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:34:32 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0657-0, 12/12/2006), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean > Just be cautions on using vinyl-ester in an otherwise epoxy > environment. You cannot lay up vinyl-ester over epoxy. It doesn't > adhere. You can go the other way, though I can't imagine why. > > Best Regards, > > Steve Thomas Steve, That's what I've heard as well - it seems that the epoxy can adhere to most well prepared surfaces ( bonds better) than other synthetic products. George ( down under)