X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-04.southeast.rr.com ([24.25.9.103] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4) with ESMTP id 1717984 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 07:38:51 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.103; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-100-190.carolina.res.rr.com [24.74.100.190]) by ms-smtp-04.southeast.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id kBRCbn8J022259 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 07:37:49 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <001e01c729b3$d92a2090$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Fw: Prop Suitability Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 07:38:01 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001B_01C72989.F007CD50" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C72989.F007CD50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thought some of you might be interested in Paul Lipps response to my e = mail concerning his plans for his unique propeller. I sent him another = e mail asking whether the CS was going to be hydraulic or electric = control of pitch. Ed ----- Original Message -----=20 =20 To: Ed Anderson=20 Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 9:23 PM Subject: Re: Prop Suitability Hi, Ed! I'm working with a prop builder, and we're going to bring out a = three-blade CS prop of my design specifically for the RV-series with = 150-200+ hp, 150 -240 mph TAS. 'Course, there's a long way to go to get = a design, then make and test some to be sure that it is flaw free. When = this takes place, there will be lots of publicity so everyone will know = about it. My fixed-pitch three-blade has reduced static thrust since = there is so little area outboard, and yet my little Lancair, with a 125 = HP O-235, climbs at about 1500 ft/sec at 1350 lb, 110 mph IAS, sea = level. I estimate the prop's efficiency at 82% in a climb.=20 'Wish I could give you something firmer. 'Still no website! Thanks for = your inquiry! Paul ----- Original Message -----=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ed Anderson=20 To: elippse@sbcglobal.net=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 6:44 PM Subject: Prop Suitability Hello Paul, I have read with great interest (who has not?) the literature on the = effectiveness of your elliptical propeller. =20 Just two quick questions, would such a propeller be suitable for = aircraft flying between 160-200 MPH or do you need a faster aircraft = to gain the maximum benefit? ( I have a Mazda Rotary powered RV-6A). Second question. Would the propeller be more/less effective than the = typical fixed pitch wood prop in the take off and climb regime? In = otherwords, does it have meaningful benefits at less that full boogie = airspeed. I realize there are dozens of parameters that would probably need to = be defined for any quantitative assessment - but, just a "seat of the = pants" assessment is fine. By the way, do you have a website? Thanks and Happy Holidays Ed Ed Anderson Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.25/593 - Release Date: = 12/19/2006 1:17 PM ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C72989.F007CD50 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thought some of you might be interested in Paul = Lipps=20 response to my e mail concerning his plans for his unique = propeller.  I=20 sent him another  e mail asking whether the CS was going to be = hydraulic or electric control of pitch.
 
 
Ed
----- Original Message -----=20
 
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: Prop Suitability

Hi, Ed!
       I'm working with a prop builder, = and we're=20 going to bring out a  three-blade CS prop of my design specifically = for the=20 RV-series with 150-200+ hp, 150 -240 mph TAS. 'Course, there's a = long way=20 to go to get a design, then make and test some to be sure that it = is flaw=20 free. When this takes place, there will  be lots of publicity so = everyone=20 will know about it. My fixed-pitch three-blade has reduced static = thrust=20 since there is so little area outboard, and yet my little Lancair, = with a=20 125 HP O-235, climbs at about 1500 ft/sec at 1350 lb, 110 mph IAS, sea = level. I=20 estimate the prop's efficiency at 82% in a = climb. 
'Wish I could = give=20 you something firmer. 'Still no website! Thanks for your=20 inquiry!   Paul
----- Original Message -----=20
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Ed=20 Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, = 2006 6:44=20 PM
Subject: Prop Suitability

Hello Paul,
 
I have read with great interest (who has not?) = the=20 literature on the effectiveness of your elliptical propeller. =20
 
Just two quick questions, would such a = propeller be=20 suitable for aircraft flying between 160-200 MPH or do you=20 need a  faster aircraft  to gain the maximum = benefit? ( I=20 have a Mazda Rotary powered RV-6A).
 
Second question.  Would the propeller be = more/less=20 effective than the typical fixed pitch wood prop in the take off and = climb=20 regime?  In otherwords, does it have meaningful benefits at less = that=20 full boogie airspeed.
 
I realize there are dozens of parameters that = would=20 probably need to be defined for any quantitative assessment - but, = just a=20 "seat of the pants" assessment is fine.
 
By the way, do you have a = website?
 
Thanks and Happy Holidays
 
Ed
 
Ed Anderson
Rv-6A N494BW Rotary = Powered
Matthews,=20 NC
eanderson@carolina.rr.comhttp:/= /members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW
http://www.dmack.net/mazda= /index.html


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free = Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.25/593 - Release = Date:=20 12/19/2006 1:17 PM
------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C72989.F007CD50--