X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 50 [XX] Return-Path: Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.73] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4) with ESMTP id 1714388 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 25 Dec 2006 15:50:16 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.73; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm69aec.bellsouth.net ([70.149.5.44]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20061225204928.CGE21237.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm69aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Mon, 25 Dec 2006 15:49:28 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.12] (really [70.149.5.44]) by ibm69aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20061225204927.YFME14910.ibm69aec.bellsouth.net@[192.168.0.12]> for ; Mon, 25 Dec 2006 15:49:27 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bulent Aliev Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] fuel pumps Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 15:49:25 -0500 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Lou, I have my fuel pumps in parallel and turning on/of the second changes little. But if you are using one pump and it stops, the engine will stop in about 1-2 seconds. Use both pumps on TO and landing. Buly On Dec 25, 2006, at 2:05 PM, lou rubin wrote: > Is it common procedure to use both fuel pumps on for > take off & landing? Its great redundency, however, Im > concerned there may be to much fuel pressure. > > Lou > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/