X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com ([24.25.9.100] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 1624559 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:22:32 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.100; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-100-190.carolina.res.rr.com [24.74.100.190]) by ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id kAUGLiqu012183 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:21:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000101c7149b$a24c6330$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Question on Secondary diffusers Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:55:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01C71401.08D666A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C71401.08D666A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I use the diffusers in both the primary and secondary. If I were to = chose, I would say they offer more benefit with the primary injectors in = the block as these are closer to the port and have less time for the = fuel spray to atomize. Ed ----- Original Message -----=20 From: DLOMHEIM@aol.com=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 9:33 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Question on Secondary diffusers Is there an easy way to remove the small plastic looking diffusers = located in the intake manifold secondary runners? If I do remove them = is it worth placing them in the new holes I'll be drilling to place the = secondaries on the side of the stock six port manifold vs. the top = (Tracy's idea from 1998 or so). I appears that it may be possible to = push them out to the inside (or outside), but I can't tell for sure and = don't necessarily want to break them if there would be some benefit in = reinstalling them later. Thanks for any comments. Doug ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C71401.08D666A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I use the diffusers in both the primary and = secondary. =20 If I were to chose, I would say they offer more benefit with the primary = injectors in the block as these are  closer to the port and have = less time=20 for the fuel spray to atomize.
 
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 DLOMHEIM@aol.com=20
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, = 2006 9:33=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Question = on=20 Secondary diffusers

Is there an easy way to remove the small plastic looking = diffusers=20 located in the intake manifold secondary runners?  If I do remove = them is=20 it worth placing them in the new holes I'll be drilling to place the=20 secondaries on the side of the stock six port manifold vs. the = top=20 (Tracy's idea from 1998 or so).  I appears that it may be = possible to=20 push them out to the inside (or outside), but I can't tell for = sure and=20 don't necessarily want to break them if there would be some benefit in = reinstalling them later.
 
Thanks for any comments.
 
Doug 
------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C71401.08D666A0--