|
|
I don't get it. All measurement systems are arbitrary. The "English" system certainly came from some odd roots. But so did the railroad track gauge (it was the width of a horse drawn wagon track.) And guess what else? The Space Shuttle booster rockets were designed around the same gauge so it could be shipped to its final destination. The metric system was designed around what they thought was the circumference of the earth. They got it wrong. And, 1 cc is not the same as 1 ml., though that was the intent. Now, all measurements are based on a metal rod, or other device, residing in a refrigerator at a constant temperature in the National Weights and Measures office for the US and somewhere in France for metric measurements.
OK, the SAE system may be a little convoluted, but once you learn it, it works just fine. Oh, I forgot, we should change just because the Europeans use it. Should we also adopt soccer as our national pastime just because the "rest of the world" sees soccer as their national pastime? I mean, almost no one adopts our version of football. Just because "they" do it is not an a-priori reason do to so.
Will we eventually migrate over to metric de-facto even though we have rejected a de-juris solution? Maybe. But in the interim, SAE works just fine, and in the absence of a compelling economic reason to do so, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Best Regards,
Steve
____________________________________________________________________
On Nov 25, 2006, at 5:40 PM, Bulent Aliev wrote:
I just think it is embarrassing that the US cant seem to adopt the international system...
|
|